Based on the U.S. Treasury bond rate, the market return and the beta, Davcher's expected rate of return would be 6.5%.
<h3>What is the expected rate of return?</h3>
Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the expected rate of return would be:
= Risk free rate + Beta x Market premium
Market premium:
= Market return - risk free rate
= 8% - 3% rate of treasury bonds
= 5%
Expected rate of return is:
= 3% + 0.70 x 5%
= 6.5%
Find out more on the Capital Asset Pricing Model at brainly.com/question/15851284.
Answer:
When using a financial calculator to compute the issue price of the bonds, the applicable periodic interest rate ("I") is 3.923%
Explanation:
Hi, first, the discount interest rate that you have to choose is 8%, because 9% is the coupon rate (which in our case would be 9%/2=4.5% and this is used only to find the amount to be paid semi-annually).
Now we know we have to choose 8%, but this is an effective rate (I know this is an effective rate because no units were mentioned), and by definition it is a periodic rate, but it is not the rate that we need since the payments are going to be made in a semi-annual way, therefore we need to use the following equation.
![r(semi-annual)=[1+r(annual)]^{\frac{1}{2} } -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%28semi-annual%29%3D%5B1%2Br%28annual%29%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%7D%20-1)
So, everything should look like this.
![r(semi-annual)=[1+0.08]^{\frac{1}{2} } -1=0.03923](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%28semi-annual%29%3D%5B1%2B0.08%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%7D%20-1%3D0.03923)
Therefore, the periodic interest that yuo have to use to calculate the price of the bond is 3.923%
Best of luck.
Answer:
(A) True
Explanation:
Differential cost is the difference between the cost to produce Product O and produce Product P; in this case it’s the additional cost of $13 per pound to produce
So the statement “The differential cost of producing Product P is $13 per pound” is true
Agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
<h3>What are the objectives of antitrust law?</h3>
The Sherman Act, the nation's first antitrust statute, was enacted by Congress in 1890 as a "comprehensive charter of economic liberty designed to maintain open and unhindered competition as the rule of commerce." The antitrust laws generally prohibit unauthorized mergers and business practices, leaving it to the courts to determine which ones are prohibited based on the specific facts of each case.
From the era of horses and buggies to the modern digital era, courts have applied antitrust rules to evolving marketplaces. Nevertheless, for more than a century, the antitrust laws have had the same fundamental goal: to safeguard the competitive process for the benefit of consumers, by ensuring that there are strong incentives for businesses to operate effectively, keep prices low, and keep quality high.
<h3>The three core federal antitrust laws:</h3>
- Any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, or combination to monopolize" is prohibited by the Sherman Act, as is "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade."
- The Sherman Act has harsh penalties that can be applied. The Sherman Act is a criminal law as well, and although the majority of enforcement actions are civil, anyone or any company that violates it may face legal action from the Department of Justice.
- "Unfair techniques of competition" and "unfair or deceptive activities or practices" are prohibited by the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
brainly.com/question/8431756
#SPJ4
Answer:
And he has reasons to be angry. The hotels usually are part of a large chain that can provide service for costumers to be happy in the given case that something like what you described happens. The hotel is not taking into account the interest and concerns of it's costumer and that will greatly affect the reputation the have.
Explanation:
When a company "Guarantee" a service or product is under the moral obligation to satisfy the costumer on the terms previously agreed on. Managers should be aware that failing to fix the problem will no doubt affect the perception of possible clients in the future.
