Bourbon Triumvirate refers to Georgia's politicians of the post-Reconstruction era: Joseph E. Brown, Alfred H. Colquitt, and John B. Gordon.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Ms. Coulter was successful using a token reinforcement system with Jordan to decrease his inappropriate behaviors in class. Mr. Johnson is now going to implement the same token system in his class in hope that Jordan's behavior will improve. This is an example of what generalization technique?
a. train loosely
b. sequentially modify
c. introduce to naturally maintaining contingencies
d. mediate generalization
Answer:
This is an example of:
b. sequentially modify
Explanation:
Sequential modification refers to the implementation of a certain system or procedure in different settings, expecting similar results to occur. For instance, a certain reinforcement system was applied at school. It generated a change in behavior at school, but not at home. Then, it is applied at home with the purpose of generating a change of behavior there as well. This is what we have in the passage provided. Mr. Johnson wishes to obtain the same or similar results to Ms. Coulter's by applying the same token reinforcement system.
Yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy
Direct democracy : a condition in which the people are directly involved in the Governance
Socialist : a condition in which a country's resource are controlled by social community and also for their own benefit
hope this helps
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
When constructing an argumentative essay, incorporate sources that are or are close to irrefutable and have relevance to what you are discussing. For example, if your topic is about why sanitary napkins for women should be free at school then present facts about how not everyone has access to them at home or how the expense would not cost a lot. However, no matter what you say it can not be opinion driven and you must have valir reasons and statistics to support your point. So using the previous topic, I would mention the actual estimated price free sanitary napkins would cost or talk about the struggles of teenage girls or teachers who cannot afford tampons. Additionally in your argumentative essay, you will need a counterclaim which is you rebuting a popular misconception or a common opposing viewpoint. For example, one may mention how female students and faculty would abuse the privilege and would not use it for only emergencies. They would then combat the statement by highlighting how many schools that do offer free sanitary napkins obtained a specific system that allows them to monitor who is borrowing what and the quantity of how much they borrow by making the pads accessible at the nurse or the administration office. You will know if something supports your claim if the evidence has the same topic and main idea as your objective and if it does not disprove your belief.
