Answer:
a. people’s relationship to the means of production
Explanation:
As a Philosopher and Economist, Karl Marx propounded a lot of theories, especially in the areas of Capitalism and Communism. According to Karl Marx, Social Stratification is borne out of the ability of people in economic affairs and also the different relationships people have with regard to the factors of production. The difference according to him is based on certain factors like class, race, and gender.
Karl Marx identified two different groups as he said one involves those who possess the factors of production and those who give out themselves to those who own the factors of production. This is a typical example of the relationship that exists between employees and employers.
Answer:
(B) destruction–creation
Explanation:
According to Psychologist Daniel Levinson and his comprehensive theory of adult development, Angelo is confronting the development task known as Destruction-Creation. This is when a middle aged person begins to better visualize his own mortality and begins to realize the ways they have acted destructively, causing the person to try to make up for their regrets.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Polyester<span> is a thread is made from a plastic compound. Its super cheap to make and that is why it is so widely used.</span>
Answer:
The looking-glass self.
Explanation:
<u>The looking-glass self</u> is a sociological theory created by American sociologist Charles Cooley. This theory refers to a process where individuals base their self-image or self-worth on how they believe they are perceived by others. Cooley mentions there are three steps in this process: how we believe we appear to other people; how we believe they judge us, and how we act or change depending on how we judge others. In this example, Martin has formed an idea of how he thinks others see him and judge him - ridiculous and as a slob because of the stain on his shirt. This leads to him feeling embarrassed.
Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.