Answer:
[B] Only State A and State B can take action against Bill.
Explanation:
This is because the whole details of the transaction took place between State A and State B. This is why the states involved can take action against Bill. If not, then all the States would have had the right to take action against Bill.
This analysis validates that Only State A and State B would be able to take action against Bill.
Answer:
War is a development issue. War kills, and its consequences extend far beyond deaths in battle. Armed conflict often leads to forced migration, long-term refugee problems, and the destruction of infrastructure. Social, political, and economic institutions can be permanently damaged
Explanation:
Answer: C) so that Japan could gain dominance of the Pacific region.
Damage to some cultures and cultural blending
Answer:
Option A: Analogical reasoning is an approach to understanding past patterns.
Explanation:
When a person applies analogical reasoning they compare something in their current environment with past phenomena to help understand what is transpiring. Organizations use earlier cases to try to understand how their actions might affect the future. While analogies can be useful, the past does not repeat in the future in any simple way. You have to be able to discern what is important in the pattern and how it can be applied forward to inform on present actions. When applying analogical reasoning there needs to be careful attention to the similarities and differences between the phenomena or cases being contrasted and compared.
