Answer:
B. More than one quadrilateral exists with the given conditions, and all instances must be isosceles trapezoids.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a parallelogram, adjacent angles are supplementary. They are only congruent if the parallelogram is a rectangle. In this problem, adjacent angles are both congruent and acute. If this were a triangle, it would guarantee the triangle is isosceles.
The fact that opposite angles are supplementary guarantees that the fourth side of the figure is parallel to the base between the acute angles. That makes the figure an isosceles trapezoid. Unless specific angles and side lengths are specified, the description matches <em>any</em> isosceles trapezoid.
m∠DWC=138°, ∠AWB = 138°, ∠AWD = 42°, ∠BWC = 42°
Solution:
Line 
intersect at a point W.
Given 
.
<em>Vertical angle theorem:</em>
<em>If two lines intersect at a point then vertically opposite angles are congruent.</em>
<u>To find the measure of all the angles:</u>
∠AWB and ∠DWC are vertically opposite angles.
Therefore, ∠AWB = ∠DWC
⇒ ∠AWB = 138°
Sum of all the angles in a straight line = 180°
⇒ ∠AWD + ∠DWC = 180°
⇒ ∠AWD + 138° = 180°
⇒ ∠AWD = 180° – 138°
⇒ ∠AWD = 42°
Since ∠AWD and ∠BWC are vertically opposite angles.
Therefore, ∠AWD = ∠BWC
⇒ ∠BWC = 42°
Hence the measure of the angles are
m∠DWC=138°, ∠AWB = 138°, ∠AWD = 42°, ∠BWC = 42°.
So we have -23 degrees to start
Then add 5 to it
It becomes -23+5=-18
Now subtract 7 from that so -18-7=-25 degrees
Hope this helps
Answer: A
Suppose that the last dollar that Victoria receives as income
brings her a marginal utility of 10 utils while the last dollar that
Fredrick receives as income brings him a marginal utility of
15 utils. If our goal is to maximize the combined total utility of
Victoria and Fredrick, we should
a. Redistribute income from Victoria to Frederick
b. Redistribute income from Fredrick to Victoria
c. Not engage in any redistribution because the current situation already maximizes total utility
d. None of the above
Step-by-step explanation:
Marginal utility is the added satisfaction derived from consuming an additional unit of a good or service. In the above question, Fredrick derives more satisfaction from his last dollar than Victoria, and will therefore achieve a higher marginal utility with additional income than Victoria does with her current income. If we want to maximize the combined utility, we should redistribute income from Victoria to Fredrick.
The logic behind this is the diminishing marginal utility. The first unit of a good consumed gives the highest level of satisfaction, marginal utility reduces with additional units consumed. In the same way, when we spend our income, we purchase the things that give us the maximum satisfaction first.
.
