Of the choices you provided the one that didn't have anything to do with starting the war was the forming of an a<span>n alliance between Germany and the United States. This had nothing to do with the war starting.</span>
I apologize for the ones I missed. :( but I hope this still is right!
Formed in response to the creation of NATO: Warsaw Pact
An alliance created to prevent Communism: North Atlantic Treaty Organization (or NATO)
A race to see who could create the most nuclear weapons: Nuclear arms race
Biased information used to influence public opinion: Propaganda
A strong feeling of pride in one’s country: Patriotism
The closing off of a port or harbor to prevent entrance or exit: Blockade
Countries that help each other in war: Military aid
Answer:
B. It is usually a statement that the researcher hopes to demonstrate is true.
Explanation:
Alternative hypothesis is an assumption that there is inequality present between the means of the values of a population being compared, ie, it is an assumption that the alternative hypothesis is true. In other words, an alternative hypothesis is considered as any hypothesis that reflects the doubt that caused the researcher to perform the test. It is always represented by an inequality. This inequality represents the possible values of the evaluated parameter.
Answer:Sociological research is especially important with respect to public policy debates. The political controversies that surround the question of how best to respond to terrorism and violent crime are difficult to resolve at the level of political rhetoric. Often, in the news and in public discourse, the issue is framed in moral terms and therefore, for example, the policy alternatives get narrowed to the option of either being “tough” or “soft” on crime. Tough and soft are moral categories that reflect a moral characterization of the issue. A question framed by these types of moral categories cannot be resolved using evidence-based procedures. Posing the debate in these terms narrows the range of options available and undermines the ability to raise questions about what responses to crime actually work.
In fact policy debates over terrorism and crime seem especially susceptible to the various forms of specious, unscientific reasoning described later in this chapter. The story of the isolated individual, whose specific act of violence becomes the basis for the belief that the criminal justice system as a whole has failed, illustrates several qualities of unscientific thinking: knowledge based on casual observation, knowledge based on over-generalization, and knowledge based on selective evidence. The sociological approach to policy questions is essentially different since it focuses on examining the effectiveness of different social control strategies for addressing different types of violent behaviour and the different types of risk to public safety. Thus, from a sociological point of view, it is crucial to think systematically about who commits violent acts and why.
Although moral claims and opinions are of interest to sociologists, sociological researchers use empirical evidence (that is, evidence corroborated by direct experience and/or observation) combined with the scientific method to deliver sound sociological research. A truly scientific sociological study of the social causes that lead to terrorist or criminal violence would involve a sequence of prescribed steps: defining a specific research question that can be answered through empirical observation; gathering information and resources through detailed observation; forming a hypothesis; testing the hypothesis in a reproducible manner; analyzing and drawing conclusions from the data; publishing the results; and anticipating further development when future researchers respond to and re-examine the findings.
Explanation: The major factors responsible for these experimentations had earlier being revealed and portrayed.
Answer:
Qianlong, the emperor of China, in response to Lord Macartney wrote a letter to King George III. He states that the Chinese and the British way of life is different that he was not interested in developing a trade relationship between the two powers.
Hope this helps!
Sincerely; Victoria<3
