Answer:
2.23 is the price earnings ratio.
Explanation:
Firstly we must find the Earnings per share for this problem as it is needed to calculate the price earnings ratio so earnings per share = (Net income)/(Number of shares outstanding).
we are given net income of $401000 then to obtain number of shares outstanding for 2015 are $267000/$10 as we saw the company's common stock account balance all year long was that value of which each share has a par value of $10, then we get outstanding shares which are 26700 now we calculate the earnings per share (EPS) by using the above formula with substituting the above mentioned values :
Earnings Per Share= $401000/26700
= $15.01872659
now we will use the Price Earnings Ratio formula which is
Price Earnings Ratio = (current share price)/(earnings per share )
we have been given a current share price of $33.50 now we will use the earnings per share which was calculated above.
Price Earnings Ratio = $33.50/$15.01872659
= 2.230548628 then we round off the answer to two decimal places
Price Earnings Ratio = 2.23
Answer:
The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining “factor” or “sphere” of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis. This takes account of man as a creative being, capable of realizing his freedom through his own activity. In this article the theory of the determining role of the “economic factor”, and the theory of factors in general have been examined. The economic interpretation of history, a variant of the theory of factors, has been acknowledged as partly true for the self‐alienated man and society, but the theory of factors in any variant has been found inadequate as a general theory of man, or society. The possibility of freedom cannot be reduced to the fact that the determining roles played by “factors”, vary, or to the hope that the economic “factor” can be subordinated to a “better” one. Man's freedom consists in his resolving the conflict of “factors”, and in realizing himself as an integral creative being, no longer split into independent and mutually opposed spheres.
Explanation:
that should help
The answer is "incidental beneficiary".
An incidental beneficiary refers to somebody who indirectly acquires an advantage as the aftereffect of the fundamental reason for the trust. An incidental beneficiary is a recipient who isn't a planned recipient. For instance, a grandchild may profit by his/her parent accepting a blessing which could be utilized by the whole family, or which he/she may acquire from the parent.
Answer:
Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58
Explanation:
A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.
If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33
This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.
Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58
Answer:
Increasing Returns on Investment helps business increase its capacity to to respond to customers, stockholders, governments, employees, and other stakeholders, which results in better-quality products, higher financial returns, and high quality of work life.