Answer:
The journal entry is as follows:
Work in process A/c Dr. $158,700
Manufacturing overhead A/c Dr. $2,250
To Raw material inventory $160,950
(To record the issuance of materials)
Workings:
- Work in process is debited with direct material:
= 88,700 + 27,600 + 3,650 + 38,750
= $158,700
- Manufacturing overhead debited with indirect material cost = $2,250
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
Answer: 0.48 minutes
Explanation:
Takt time = Net time available / Daily demand
Net time available is number of minutes in a shift so:
= 8 hours * 60 minutes
= 480 minutes
Daily demand = 1,000 units
Takt time = 480 / 1,000
= 0.48 minutes
C. None of the individuals who end up working are paid more than if the were paid the equilibrium wage.
