1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WARRIOR [948]
3 years ago
12

Liberal or conservative?

History
1 answer:
enot [183]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. both ( mostly conservative )

Explanation:

2. conservitive

3. liberal

4. liberal

5. conservitive

6. liberal

You might be interested in
What role did royal mummies play in the building of the incan empire
ss7ja [257]

The role the royal mummies played in the building of the Incan empire was that they helped to preserve their culture of ancestor and emperor preservation and worship.

<h3>What is Mummification?</h3>

This refers to the process of preserving a dead body to keep it fresh and this was used by both the Egyptians and the Incans to preserve and honor important people.

Hence, we can see that the roles they played were that they helped to preserve their culture and also to preserve and worship the dead and keep their bodies as alive as possible.

Read more about mummification here:

brainly.com/question/1750866

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
What is not necessary for all organism to survive
Sliva [168]
The answer is probably parents, organisms ca usually survive on their own! :)
3 0
3 years ago
How important do you think the civil service system is to the overall organization and operation of the federal bureaucracy
Irina18 [472]
The civil service system is much better than the alternative, which was Patronage. as implemented by the Hoover Commission. Civil service sets employment competence standards for hiring and makes working a permanent career, not just until the next election. it was so outstandingly successful, that virtually every state and community government follows it to large extent.
I hope this helps :)
3 0
3 years ago
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
how did political machines, like Tammany Hall in New York City, influence politics during the Gilded Age
grigory [225]
A political machine is a political organization in which an authoritative boss or small group commands the support of a corps of supporters and businesses (usually campaign workers), who receive rewards for their efforts. The machine's power is based on the ability of the workers to get out the vote for their candidates on election day.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In addition to the boll weevil, what other natural disaster greatly affected cotton farmers in the 1920s?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a criticism of free trade?
    10·1 answer
  • A dispute over a contract between two people in the same city would most likely be heard first in a federal trial court. a feder
    7·1 answer
  • 8. The White Man's Burden refers to which of the following...
    10·1 answer
  • Why did other countries pay tribute to the Qing Empire?
    13·1 answer
  • The ______ was fought with ideas, words, and money.<br> Please help ASAP! Please and thank you!
    13·1 answer
  • Marking brainliest (easy)<br><br> Is my PIQ response good or not? Do I need to make changes?
    14·1 answer
  • Write a complete outline of the study here. Follow the examples from the activity to help you. This assignment is worth 20 point
    12·1 answer
  • Fill in the blanks to combine important ideas in baseball's history.
    15·1 answer
  • The major historical and political significance of the mayflower compact was that it?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!