Progressivism ended with WORLD WAR 1
Answer: The year 2014 marked the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a milestone in the struggle to extend civil, political, and legal rights and protections to African Americans, including former slaves and their descendants, and to end segregation in public and private facilities. The U.S. Senate played an integral part in this story.
The long Senate debate over the Civil Rights Act began on February 10, 1964, when the House of Representatives passed H.R. 7152. When the House-passed bill arrived in the Senate on February 26, Majority Leader Mike Mansfield placed it directly on the Senate calendar rather than refer it to the Judiciary Committee. Chaired by civil rights opponent James Eastland of Mississippi, that committee had become a graveyard for civil rights legislation. Mansfield moved to take up the measure on March 9 and it became the Senate's pending business on March 26, prompting southern senators to launch a filibuster. That protracted filibuster, along with the broader debate over the bill, continued through 60 days of debate, until cloture was invoked on June 10, 1964. This marked the first time in its history that the Senate invoked cloture on a civil rights bill. The Senate passed the bill on June 19, 1964, by a vote of 73 to 27.
Explanation:
Because serfs did everything for them, and without serfs they would have to do them themselves
Answer:
separate themselves from those who were unlike them
Explanation:
As nationalism emerged in kingdoms and other regions of the world, where previously the notion of being a group with a common past, culture and history, and the shared language similarities did not exist before.
A conscience of sharing this heritage make them different to other groups that promoted other set of values.
Nationalism was driven often by romantic feelings, or revolutionary ideals, like the wave that schocked European continent with Napoleon Bonaparte.
The desire of people to have a shared identity often led to social movements that wanted to form their own nation-state, also leading to wars of Independence: (For example Serbia, and Bosnia in the Austro-Hungarian Empire). Poland sought always independence from the Russian and German oppresors (embracing the so called Romantic -Nationalism).
This is just my opinion;
I feel like the president should have told Congress. He should have discussed the options with them before deploying troops. Also, the House Armed Services Committee should have discussed things in a better way rather than demanding things from the president. Congress seems to be in the right since the War Powers Act requires the president to let Congress know within two days of sending US troops overseas. The president didn’t talk with them, and then he didn’t let them know very soon after.
