The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The theoretical perspective that would be most appropriate for studying the experiences of migrant farmworkers in the United States would be racialized discourses.
In sociology terms, when we talk about racialized discourse, we mean the kind of discourses and references that involved racial issues.
In the case of immigrant farmworkers in the United States, there have always been racial issues about immigrants that arrive in the US looking for better opportunities for their families. From the 1800s to this precise day, immigrants are not well accepted by white Americans for many reasons. White Americans believe that "America is only for Americans." They think that immigrants took jobs that belong to the American people. They think that immigrants distort the American culture with their own customs, culture, language, religion, and traditions.
The type of fallacy that's expressed regarding the toddler is known as a slippery slope fallacy.
<h3>What's fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy simply means a deceptive argument. This is an argument where the conclusion isn't well supported by the premises.
Slippery slope argument is an argument that suggests that a minor action will lead to a major consequence.
Learn more about fallacy on:
brainly.com/question/20939336
I believe the answer is: <span>An optimistic explanatory style; be healthier and persist despite setbacks
</span>People with optimistic explanatory style would explain/interpret every occurrences that happen in their life with positive outlook.
This would tend to make them unlikely to get into depression and tend to keep making effort to improving the quality of their life.
Answer:
the will made with undue influence
Explanation:
A testator is simply an anyone who writes a will and also anyone who executes a valid will or a given legacy.
In this scenario called undue influence where a person influences or persuades the testator to alter or make some changes his or her will due to the fact that the testator vulnerable state(emotionally and physically unstable).
Anyone can influences a testator. the people who can easily persuade a testator to make changes in his/her will are those who are close to the testator and also recognizes that the testator is not emotionally and physically stable and so they persuades the testator to agree to their demand and make the changes in the will.
