The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can answer the following.
Cattle on an open range, in some areas, may compact fragile soils while grazing. This can damage plant roots, leading to fewer, smaller plants, which may in turn cause cattle to graze more and work harder to obtain food. This is an example of a positive feedback loop.
This term is used to transmit the following meaning: the transformation of the ecosystem; from its traditional balanced state to a different situation due to the external circumstances that affect it. Although the external influence could be minor, it has a direct effect on the ecosystem of the place. It can be the result of the consequences due to a determined cause.
Answer:
D. Proclamation of Neutrality
Explanation:
During the French Revolution, Revolutionary Franch declared war on Great Britain. Many European countries supported Britain against France. George Washington, the first president of the United States, believed that his country was too young and week to get involved in foreign wars. So to prevent United States or its citizens from getting involved in the war, he issued the Proclamation of Neutrality. It legally forbade American citizens from providing any kind of aid either Britain or France.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Answer: Do you still need help
Explanation:
