Answer:
This is a philosophical approach, it must be taken into account that in ethical theory there is a large number of moral coincidences, such as: it is wrong to steal and its universality, in ethical theories. But there are also many differences between ethical theories, one very important and which divides them into two types, are the Materialist ethical theories and those that are not. Materialistic ethical theories are those that in general tell us what we must do to achieve good and to be good, that is, they are content ethics pursues a series of ethical norms about what we must do, they condition the rules or norms to persecuted objects.
In the ethical theories indicated there are differences, those of materialistic tendencies: first: the tendency of divine command very similar to the naturalistic theory of Saint Thomas, which defends the good with the approach to a supreme God and follows the law of divine origin . Second: DJMill's utilitarianism good is the pleasure or absence of pain and is achieved through pleasure actions. Now it is pointed out that Kantism (non-materialist) corresponds to being a formal ethic whose author was Kant, defends good with the only morally good, a good intention and seeks to achieve good in the imperative, categorical, acts in a way that he can wish without contradiction , points out that the maxim is taken as a universal law. Kantina's law is called formal and comes before material ethics.
Answer:
civil disobedience.
Explanation:
Civil disobedience is also known as passive resistance and its peaceful refusal of the people to bey the government laws or orders which they consider unjust. Started in India it has a global reach, where people represent their resentment to the discriminatory practices of government or any other authority in a peaceful manner. As per the question resentment of the African American to leave the park is the example of civil disobedience because he refuses to obey against the unjust demand of the municipality.
In the in the focus box changing the behavior of others, in which this strategy is called the time-out from positive reinforcement procedure. In addition, a time-out from reinforcement is a process in which a child is positioned in a different, less-rewarding situation or setting when he or she involves in undesirable or unsuitable behavior. Characteristically, time-out is used in tandem with positive discipline techniques. A time-out might be employed to reduce the frequency of a student's negative behaviors which is, for example, vulgar oppositions with teaching staff while an individualized reward system might be put in place to upsurge the frequency of appropriate student behaviors which is for example rapidly and courteously obeying with teacher requirements.
