First, a physical property just identifies it's state, how it looks, color, and that stuff. Let's work on finding that.
⇔ Ability to rust wouldn't work as a physical property. That one changes the substance, making it a chemical change. So, we know that this can certainly be our answer!
<span>I usually think of biology first, and then physics. I trust those types of science a whole lot more than social sciences. I don't think of it like most non-sciency people do (like with diet pills and perfume). I think of it like using the actual scientific method, doing the same thing over and again expecting different results, taking the objective (or subjective, when that applies) results and forming a logical conclusion and not one that fits your hypothesis/agenda. Kind of like those kids that every high school has (on TV shows, they're the ones that are doing something with robotics all the time) that are nerdy, science geeks always running experiments and seeing what happens. </span>
The type of ecological succession being described in the illustration is primary succession.
<h3>What is primary succession?</h3>
It is a form of succession that occurs when an area that has never been occupied by any living organism becomes exposed and eventually gets colonized by living organisms.
It is quite different from secondary succession which happens when an area that has been housing biotic communities before gets disrupted by a major disturbance.
A new island formed by volcanic action has never housed any biotic community before. Thus, only primary succession can occur there.
More on primary succession can be found here: brainly.com/question/26675203
#SPJ1
The correct answer is C. One change on Earth's surface can result in changes to other Earth systems.
Statistically, none of the other problems would make sense when looking at the graph, other than question A, which we know is the opposite way around.
Hope this helped!
