1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
3 years ago
15

5,391 divided 77 estimate

Mathematics
1 answer:
neonofarm [45]3 years ago
6 0
<span>5,391 divided 77 = 70.01...........

by estimation 

70</span>
You might be interested in
The water pressure on Mustafa as he dives is increasing at a rate of 0.9920.9920, point, 992 atmospheres (\text{atm})(atm)left p
Paha777 [63]
This problem is a simple dimensional analysis. We are simply tasked to express the rate 0.992 atm/m to atm/km.

Dimensional analysis, in simpler terms, is just the process of expressing an answer in another unit by multiplying conversion factors.

For this problem, we'll need to perform the following:

\frac{0.992 atm}{m}= \frac{1000m}{1km} = \frac{992atm}{km}

Notice that we used the conversion factor 1000 meters = 1 kilometer to convert the units from atm/m to atm/km. Thus, we arrive at the final answer 992 atm/km.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sequence of rigid transformations will map the preimage ABC onto image A'B'C' ?
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

The answer is option A, a double reflection

5 0
3 years ago
Evaluate the function at the indicated value of x. Round your result to three decimal places.
STatiana [176]
Fill in x=1.7 gives f(1.7) = 0.5*1.7 ≈ 0.850
7 0
3 years ago
Jada made 6 cups of blueberry jam and divided the Jam in 4 containers. How much jam went in each container ​
svetoff [14.1K]
1 1/2 blueberry jam went into each container
6 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Carlos wants to add two more bags of apples to his order. What is the new total?
    8·2 answers
  • What is 1/20 as a decimal?
    6·2 answers
  • There is a stack of 8 cards, each given a different number from 1 to 8. Suppose we select a card randomly from the stack, replac
    11·1 answer
  • What is a rational number between 1/6 and 1/12
    11·2 answers
  • the numbers 1343 and 1413 both included for which statement is true about the value represented by 4 in 413
    5·1 answer
  • How to work out the number x is reduced by 25% and then halved?
    15·1 answer
  • In the figure above CD is the perpendicular bisector of AB. three students explained how they proved ADC is congruent to BDC
    15·2 answers
  • Scale of a map is one ratio 1000 a PS4 centimeters by 3 cm what is the area in centimeter cubic a meter cubic
    15·1 answer
  • Please answer will mark brainliesttt
    5·2 answers
  • I am so confused on this because I am so sure that it’s -2
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!