Answer:
$35
Explanation:
Given:
Variable cost per unit = $35
Fixed cost per unit = $10
Sale price = $70
Computation:
Minimum Transfer price = $35
Company working on full capacity So, variable cost per unit is considered as the minimum transfer price.
Answer:
Two-way Stretch
Explanation:
Marriott Corporation now contains hotels and motels from the "budget" end of the consumer spectrum to the "premium" end with their JD Marriott flagship locations. This is an example of a firm that successfully performed a t<u>wo-way stretch</u> to reach more consumers and ventures that are more profitable.
Two way stretch: It is an expansion strategy of the company to introduce product within the same product line to cater different customer in the market. Company introduce new product to attract more customer as now they have premium product and low end product. Product are stretched both ways upward and downward. Example: Maruti, Titan, Marriot- Hotel & resorts, etc.
In the given case, Marriott Corporation now contains hotels and motels from the "budget" end of the consumer spectrum to the "premium" end with their JD Marriott flagship locations. Therefore, they are using two-way stretch strategy.
Since you gave no table,
her federal income in 14 % Rate = 14 % x 2,100
= $ 294
Her federal tax in 16 % Rate = 16 % x 2,100
= $ 336
Answer:
The right choice is "3 Correctly ignored a sunk cost"
Explanation:
As the ticket to the opera was already bought and it is nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable; whether Van decides to go to the opera or to go to the party with Amy; he has incurred $100 cost of ticket which can not be recovered in any manner.
The ticket cost in this question is categorized as sunk cost - cost that incurred in the past and will be remained the same regardless of any future actions. Thus, this type of cost should be ignored when making decision for the future.
So, "3 Correctly ignored a sunk cost" is the correct choice.
Answer:
a)
P 175
Q = 250
Profit6,250
b)
P 325
Q = 875
Profit 153,125
c)
Q = 1200
P = 260
Profit = 287,000
Explanation:
It maximize profit at MR = MC
MR = 200 - 0.2Q
MC = 150
150 = 200-0.2Q
Q = 50/0.2 = Q = 250
Price:
250 = 2000 - 10P
P = 1750/10 = 175
<u></u>
<u>Profit: revenue - cost</u>
$175 x 250 session - $150 per session = 6,250
<em>At new functions:</em>
150 = 500-0.4Q
Q = 350 / 0.4 = 875
Price:
875 = 2,500 - 5P
P = (2500-875)/5= 325
<u>Profit</u>
(325 - 150) * 875 = 153,125
<u>If cost changes:</u>
cost: 1000 + 20Q
marginal cost: 20
20 = 500 - 0.4Q
Q = 480 / 0.4 = 1,200
Price:
1,200 = 2500 - 5P
P = 1300/5 = 260
<u>Profit</u>
(260 - 20)Q - 1,000 = 287,000