1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klasskru [66]
3 years ago
9

The rule for the distributive property is

Mathematics
2 answers:
marishachu [46]3 years ago
8 0

Step-by-step explanation:

The Distributive Property is easy to remember, if you recall that "multiplication distributes over addition". Formally, they write this property as "a(b + c) = ab + ac". In numbers, this means, for example, that 2(3 + 4) = 2×3 + 2×4.

lana [24]3 years ago
8 0
Multiplication distributions over addition
You might be interested in
Wite a numerical expression for the below problems. Simplify the expressions.
ziro4ka [17]

Answer:

1) 9

2) 34

Step-by-step explanation:

For the first one, it would be

= (6×3)/2

= 18/2

= 9

The second one is,

= 36- (12/6)

= 36 - 2

= 34

4 0
2 years ago
4/5 minus 1/3 plz i need help
IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

7/15

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1

We can't subtract two fractions with different denominators. So you need to get a common denominator. To do this, you'll multiply the denominators times each other... but the numerators have to change, too. They get multiplied by the other term's denominator.

So we multiply 4 by 3, and get 12.

Then we multiply 1 by 5, and get 5.

Next we give both terms new denominators -- 5 × 3 = 15.

So now our fractions look like this:

12

15

−  

5

15

Step 2

Since our denominators match, we can subtract the numerators.

12 − 5 = 7

So the answer is:

7

15

Step 3

Last of all, we need to simplify the fraction, if possible. Can it be reduced to a simpler fraction?

To find out, we try dividing it by 2...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 3...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 5...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 7...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 11...

No good. 11 is larger than 7. So we're done reducing.

6 0
2 years ago
Please answer the question bellow
valentina_108 [34]

No solution

because delta ( b^2 - 4ac ) is lower than 0(zero) .

6 0
2 years ago
What number should be placed in the box to help complete the division calculation?
Korolek [52]

it would be 1,898 hope this helps


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Representing postulates with diagrams
dangina [55]

Answer:

the 3rd one

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The sum of 4 consecutive integers is 198
    5·1 answer
  • Is the prime factorization below correct?<br> 24 <br> 24+2.3.4<br> O Correct<br> Incorrect
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following inequalities have -8 in its solution set?
    6·1 answer
  • Find the number if: 4% of it is 31% of 16.4
    11·2 answers
  • Estimate the sale price of a futon you saw on eBay that cost $108.99 and is now on sale for 10% off. Round your answer to the ne
    7·1 answer
  • Please help, thank you.<br><br> The question is in the picture
    9·2 answers
  • PLZZZZ GIVING BRAINILEST
    6·1 answer
  • Evaluate the algebraic expression. t + s - r
    12·1 answer
  • Find the value of in the triangle shown below<br><br>9, 7, and x around the triangle <br>​
    13·1 answer
  • Can I get some help with my work?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!