Answer:
77%
Step-by-step explanation:
That is a 100 grid and if you count ALL of the shaded ones, it is 77. And that would make 77%
Answer:
last three questions are statistical question
The question is incomplete. The complete question is :
The breaking strengths of cables produced by a certain manufacturer have a mean of 1900 pounds, and a standard deviation of 65 pounds. It is claimed that an improvement in the manufacturing process has increased the mean breaking strength. To evaluate this claim, 150 newly manufactured cables are randomly chosen and tested, and their mean breaking strength is found to be 1902 pounds. Assume that the population is normally distributed. Can we support, at the 0.01 level of significance, the claim that the mean breaking strength has increased?
Solution :
Given data :
Mean, μ = 1900
Standard deviation, σ = 65
Sample size, n = 150
Sample mean,
= 1902
Level of significance = 0.01
The hypothesis are :


Test statics :
We use the z test as the sample size is large and we know the population standard deviation.




Finding the p-value:
P-value = P(Z > z)
= P(Z > 0.38)
= 1 - P(Z < 0.38)
From the z table. we get
P(Z < 0.38) = 0.6480
Therefore,
P-value = 1 - P(Z < 0.38)
= 1 - 0.6480
= 0.3520
Decision :
If the p value is less than 0.01, then we reject the
, otherwise we fail to reject
.
Since the value of p = 0.3520 > 0.01, the level of significance, then we fail to reject
.
Conclusion :
At a significance level of 0.01, we have no sufficient evidence to support that the mean breaking strength has increased.
Answer:
Hiya there!
Step-by-step explanation:
450-549
you can round up or down
<em><u>Hope this helped!</u></em> :D
Answer:
S = 8
Step-by-step explanation:
An infinite geometric series is defined as limit of partial sum of geometric sequences. Therefore, to find the infinite sum, we have to find the partial sum first then input limit approaches infinity.
However, fortunately, the infinite geometric series has already set up for you. It’s got the formula for itself which is:

We can also write in summation notation rather S-term as:

Keep in mind that these only work for when |r| < 1 or else it will diverge.
Also, how fortunately, the given summation fits the formula pattern so we do not have to do anything but simply apply the formula in.

Therefore, the sum will converge to 8.
Please let me know if you have any questions!