Ready any book. describe an interesting or important character in your book . write 5sentences

1 answer:

3 0

Answer: One of my favorite book series since middle school was called "The mortal instruments" One of the protagonists and main character goes by the name Clarissa Adele Fairchild also called Clary fray. She, as she is supposed to, caught my attention but not from the first page, after going deeper into the series i started to notice the internal as well as external struggle she faced i won't go into detail of the book since i'm sure those who are reading this are already bored, however i will say she has a strong will and a sharp mind. I'm sure someone is familiar with what i'm saying, due to the book series becoming a hit show. But, the books are just as dramatic, very imaginative, and will make any reader flipping pages instantly.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Select the correct answer. Which of these characters is a foil to Macbeth? A. Macduff B. Banquo C. Malcolm D. Donalbain ASAP

Vlad1618 [11]

Answer: B. Banpuo

Explanation:

-A foil is a character who directly contrasts the traits or qualities of another character. In most cases, the foil contrasts the main character, also called the protagonist.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What effect does Roosevelt hope to have on Americans with this appeal to emotion

Svet_ta [14]

He hopes for americans to empathize with the statement

6 0

2 years ago

Which persuasive technique does this excerpt from a speech about climate change use?

photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

Expert opinion except from a speech is about climate change uses

4 0

1 year ago

Fill in the blanks in order.

Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

The answer is came . . . give . . . wanted

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Each new step in science (blank) twenty seemingly (blank) facts as merely the various

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Each new step in science reconciles twenty seemingly discordant facts as merely the various manifestations of a single principle.

Explanation:

Even though the only context we have is the sentence itself, we can safely choose number 2. This type of sentence is used when we wish to present contrasting ideas. There would be no reason, for example, for science to unify what is already harmonious, or to undermine what is already erroneous. Those ideas are redundant. It makes much more sense to say that science reconciles facts that are seemingly discordant. That is the wonder in science: to see different things as the manifestations of a single principle, which could seem, if science did not exist, impossible.

6 0

3 years ago