None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
Europeans wanted to but more slaves they thought it was the only way to conquer their enemies
Answer:The 14th amendment was a amendment that allowed people mainly blacks to have equal protection under the laws *which really didnt really work cus of 1960s segregation yunno that stuff*
Explanation:Hope this was what you where looking for
Answer:
It examines possible interaction effects among two independent variables
Explanation:
One-way ANOVA only involves one factor or independent variable.
For the two way ANOVA there are two independent variables.
