<span>The scientific investigation has five basic steps and one feedback step: (1) to make an observation (2) to ask a question (3) hypothesize (4) predict and (5) make a new hypothesis based on the results. What is unusual about the description of Elyse’s scientific investigation is she did not follow the basic steps. She should have done observation first before asking a question and forming a hypothesis. </span>
To see what causes a change in experiment. If they kept everything the same what would be the point of experiment? One thing has to be different to test and get a result ! They have to see how that one variable changes the experiment. If they change so many things then the experiment will be messed up. They have to focus on that one variable during experiment to get the proper result. Hope this helps you. Think about it if you want to know how antibiotic effects bodies. You choose two people and you give antibiotic to one. And you don't give any other drug to the people you are testing. Because you truly want to know the effect of antibiotic alone.
So is light, but we don't use light either to power anything, even though we do know how to capture them and extract their energy.
The reason we don't use sound or light as sources of energy is because the amount of energy in the sound and light that surrounds us is pitifully small ... in the milliwatts or microwatts, whereas the things we build and operate with oil or electricity need watts or kilowatts to function.
1 watt of sound will drive you out of the room and wake the neighbors, and 1 watt of light ... if it all enters your eye ... can permanently damage your sight.