Answer:
A) My dog has barked at every car. Therefore, she will bark at the next
car.
Explanation:
Reasoning by induction:
- draws broad conclusions based on specific premises
- hypotheses based on specific evidence
- brings about broad conclusions with varying degrees of certainty (probably true, unlikely to be true)
Inductive reasoning allows for incorrect or false conclusions even if all premises are true. Like before, "I've heard my dog yip at every So she'll bark at the next one." While the premise (My dog has barked at every car) is true, the conclusion (She will bark at the next car) is not. Inductive reasoning predicts outcomes based on prior knowledge and verified observations. So does deductive reasoning.
If you notice a pattern in a sequence, you can infer the following terms. Inductive reasoning leads to a hypothesis. Inductive reasoning examines multiple scenarios or opinions/conclusions to arrive at a conclusion.assessing the strength of an argument rather than its validity
Answer:
A. text 1 does not acknowledge both sides of it argument, but text 2 does.
Explanation:
"Big Money shouldn't buy our elections" didn't acknowledge both sides of it argument while "Corporation have campaign rights, too" did.
[CloudBreeze]
Answer:
Jacob was usually a rude person.
Explanation:
A Possible Flashback could be: <em>Yesterday Jacob had punched a boy, told a girl her face was stupid, and called our dancing teacher an idiot.</em>
Answer: C. I don't like snakes.
Explanation:
An independent clause is a clause that can stand on its own as a sentence. It conveys a complete idea - in this case, that the speaker does not like snakes. It contains a subject (I) and a predicate (don't like snakes).
<em>Dependent clauses</em>, on the other hand, do not express a complete thought and cannot stand alone. A dependent clause provides information, but does not make sense on its own. "After the rain", "Until the bus came" and "While we waited," are all dependent clauses.