1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
3 years ago
14

What was the outcome of the D-Day? Who won?

History
2 answers:
Tema [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the ALLIES

Explanation:

vlabodo [156]3 years ago
5 0
D-Day was the beginning of the end for not only the Germans but Hitler most of all. D-Day forced the Germans to fight a two front war again just as they had in WWI. Yet again the Germans could not handle war on both sides of them.
You might be interested in
What might be considered the biggest weakness of the articles of confederation
d1i1m1o1n [39]
The correct answer to this is:

A. They gave the states to much autonomy

Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
How does the rule of law remain constant through changes and growth in society?
hodyreva [135]

Answer:Other important determinants of well-being, such as the proportion of a country that is tropical and the proportion that is urban, as well as economic freedom and the rule of law, are included in the multiple regression estimates. Thus, the sensitivity of poverty and environmental factors to population growth is examined with other factors held constant. Measures of the sensitivity of human well-being–the elasticities of these measures–in response to population growth can be calculated. Norton shows that characteristics such as a nation’s economic freedom and its legal framework are more important in determining the quality of human life and the environment than is population growth

The rule of law is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as: "The authority and influence of law in society, especially when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior; (hence) the principle whereby all members of a society (including those in government) are considered equally subject to publicly disclosed legal codes and processes."[2] The term "rule of law" is closely related to "constitutionalism" as well as "Rechtsstaat", and refers to a political situation, not to any specific legal rule

The rule of law implies that every person is subject to the law, including people who are lawmakers, law enforcement officials, and judges.[8] In this sense, it stands in contrast to tyranny or oligarchy where the rulers are held above the law.[citation needed] Lack of the rule of law can be found in both democracies and monarchies, for example when there is neglect or ignorance of the law. The rule of law is more apt to decay if a government has insufficient corrective mechanisms for restoring it.

Explanation:

Most legal theorists believe that the rule of law has purely formal characteristics. For instance, such theorists claim that law requires generality (general rules that apply to classes of persons and behaviors as opposed to individuals), publicity (no secret laws), prospective application (little or no retroactive laws), consistency (no contradictory laws)[38], equality (applied equally throughout all society), and certainty (certainty of application for a given situation), but formalists contend that there are no requirements with regard to the content of the law. Others, including a few legal theorists, believe that the rule of law necessarily entails protection of individual rights. Within legal theory, these two approaches to the rule of law are seen as the two basic alternatives, respectively labelled the formal and substantive approaches. Still, there are other views as well. Some believe that democracy is part of the rule of law.

Fundamentally it means that there is an appropriate system through which things must be done, and all, including those who lead, must follow it. It is important, because if we do not follow the rule of law, we have chaos. Here in the US, it is the rule of law which allows us to have our Republic.

6 0
3 years ago
Can someone please give me a summary of fort sumter and 3 important things about the battle.
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

it was bloody, tragic, and had one winner : ) sry i jus rlly need to answer a few questions to get brainly plus XD

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why was citizenship important in ancient Greece?
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

C- Citizens could take part in ruling the city-state

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The 1970s marked an important shift, as terrorists began to target and murder civilians. Which 1972 event marked the beginning o
marin [14]
Here we are again xD

The answer to your question is
 
B Palestinians terrorists kidnapped and murdered eleven Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How were the economic ideologies of the United States and the Soviet Union different?<br>​
    11·1 answer
  • How did geography affect the development of new york city and philadelphia
    12·1 answer
  • This was the agreement made between Germany and the Soviet Union in August 1939 in which both sides agreed to stay neutral in th
    14·2 answers
  • Which continent could be described as a "group of peninsulas" bordered by the Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea, the Baltic
    14·1 answer
  • What hardened colonists' attitudes toward local American Indians in Virginia during the early 1600s?
    7·1 answer
  • The main reason why towns grew in the middle ages was
    8·2 answers
  • What idea from the Mayflower Compact influenced the Declaration of Independence? Government should be for the common good, not j
    5·2 answers
  • How do modern historians create accurate historical accounts
    11·1 answer
  • Which conqueror came to Chile?<br><br> Pizzaro<br> Magellan<br> de Gama<br> Columbus
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!<br> Was big government reduced in 2005?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!