You can try to show this by induction:
• According to the given closed form, we have
, which agrees with the initial value <em>S</em>₁ = 1.
• Assume the closed form is correct for all <em>n</em> up to <em>n</em> = <em>k</em>. In particular, we assume

and

We want to then use this assumption to show the closed form is correct for <em>n</em> = <em>k</em> + 1, or

From the given recurrence, we know

so that






which is what we needed. QED
Y+4=2/3(x+3)
(-3,-4)(3,0)
1.find the slope
m=y2-y1/x2-x1
m=0-(-4)/3-(-3)
m=4/6
m=2/3
y-(-4)=2/3(x-(-3))
y+4=2/3(x+3) point-slope form
Well,
As we can see, the only difference is that the parentheses have moved.
This is an example of the associative property. It is specifically of multiplication, because products are used in this case.
Just as a test, let's see whether they are really equal.
Following PEMDAS, we get:
(2*4)7 = 2(7*4)
(8)7 = 2(28)
56 = 56
They are equivalent.
Instead of subtracting 6 from 12 then dividing they added 6 to 12 & ended up with 18. 18 by 2 is 9.
Answer:
for the points
Step-by-step explanation:
u dumb tbh