Answer:
Explanation:
░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░
░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄░░
░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░
░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░
░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░
░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░ This is Bob
▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀ ░░
▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀ ░░ Copy And Paste Him In Brainly Question,
░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄░░░ So, He Can Take
░░░░░░░▀███▀█░▄░░ Over Brainly
<span> Because the CBO is non-partisan and unbiased
</span>
The CBO is a federal budget within the legislative arm of the USA congress. in force since 1975, it has been reputed for providing independent budgetary analysis to assist congress in performing its fiscal function effectively. Its employees are strictly non-partisan and are hire as per competence basis.
<span />
The correct option here is A
A) A group of members invited William of Orange to “invade” England
James the second attempted to introduce religious tolerance and especially more rights for the catholics in a country that was strongly anglican. This was a period after the reformation when Nothern Europe was engulfed in religious civil war.
<span>
if direct democracy means (pure) democracy then it means that every
citizen would get a chance to vote on issues instead of what we have in
the US: a representative democracy where we vote in politicians to do it
for us. A pure democracy would lead to civil war most likely b/c too
many people would be able to disagree, anarchy would be a likely
result,....so i would say D is your answer </span>
<span>Basically, at one point in time while going westwards they reached states owned by Mexico, not just Native wildlands. There had to be a war then to conquer it to reach the sea. This divided people on whether or not people should fight Mexico. Another thing was that the expansion was at first mostly southern, which meant that more and more there were slave states, so they also divided on that and had to take in more northern places in to neutralize slavery influence.</span>
