Answer:
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to perform a hypothesis test on the difference between means.
The null and alternative hypothesis are:

μ1: mean heat output for subjects with the syndrome.
μ2: mean heat output for non-sufferers.
We will use a significance level of 0.05.
The difference between sample means is:

The standard error is

The t-statistic is

The degrees of freedom are

The critical value for a left tailed test at a significance level of 0.05 and 16 degrees of freedom is t=-1.746.
The t-statistic is below the critical value, so it lies in the rejection region.
The null hypothesis is rejected.
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
I would use the quadratic formula for this:
x = -b ± √b² - 4ac over 2a
x = 8 ± √64 - 4(1)(0) over 2(1)
x = 8 ± √64 over 2
x = 8 <span>± 8 over 2 [simplify]
x = 4 </span><span>± 4
x1 = 4 + 4 x2 = 4 - 4
x1 = 8 x2 = 0
Thus, the solutions for x would be 0 and 8.</span>
Best to look up the formula for the surface area of a sphere and then find it:
A = 4πr^2, where r is the radius of the sphere. Then,
A = 4π(15 in)^2 = 4(3.14)(225 in^2) = 2826 in^2 (answer)
This is represented by the formula given in the lower left.
Answer:
x= 85
Step-by-step explanation:
(7x+6)-(5x-4)=180
There is a negative 1 between the two parenthesis
-1(5x-4)
-5x+4
Now plug it back into the equation and take out the parenthesis
7x+6-5x+4= 180
2x+10=180 Now we can solve
-10 -10
2x= 170
2x/2 = 170/2
x= 85
I hope this helps! :)