Answer: hello your question has some missing data attached below is the missing data
answer :
i) The current ratio is higher than lower quartile and this signifies good liquidity position
The Quick ratio is higher than the lower quartile and also higher than the median but it is lower than the upper quartile and this signifies that the value of inventory is been deducted from the current assets. to show solvency position.
ii)
Inventory Turnover Ratio is higher when compared to the industry ratios
Explanation:
<u>i) Based on each ratio </u>
The current ratio is higher than lower quartile and this signifies good liquidity position for east coast yachts but the value of the lower quartile been lower than the median and upper quartile represents a position of lower solvency
The Quick ratio is higher than the lower quartile and also higher than the median but it is lower than the upper quartile and this signifies that the value of inventory is been deducted from the current assets to show solvency position of the company.
<u>ii) The ratio can be interpreted as</u>
Inventory Turnover Ratio is higher when compared to the industry ratios i.e. Inventory is been turned into cash by maximum times/as many times as possible per year.
<span>Although the ethics codes of the various professional organizations have specific differences, some of the common themes include: being interested in the welfare of clients, avoiding harm and exploitation, and protecting client's confidentiality and privacy.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
Answer:
to determine her income level, we must add Mary's net salary during the first 3 months + total unemployment benefits for the first 13 weeks (April, May and June) + unemployment benefits for the next 13 weeks (July, August and September) + her normal income received during the last part of the year
total income = ($40,000 x 1/4) + ($947 x 13 weeks) + ($347 x 13 weeks) + ($40,000 x 1/4) = $10,000 + $12,311 + $4,511 + $10,000 = $36,822
total spending = normal spending level during 6 months + reduced spending level for the other 6 months
total spending = ($39,000 x 1/2) + ($39,000 x 1/2 x 9/10) = $19,500 + $17,550 = $37,050
Answer:
determine cash investing and financing transactions made during the period.
Explanation:
When you analyze the statement of cash flows, you can determine and predict how will operating cash flows be in the future. E.g. a project is generating high amounts of cash, so you can predict that it will continue to do so for some time. But what you cannot predict or even compare is related to the financial and investing transactions that the company will make in the future. E.g. by analyzing a cash flow you cannot know if the company will decide to invest in other projects or will it decide to issue more stocks.
