Answer: b. in real time
Explanation:
When something is said to operate in real time, it means that is is happening instantaneously. Networked organizations that are so closely linked that their actions are seen instantaneously are therefore operating in real time.
These organizations can be in multiple countries but doing work on a similar platform. For instance, people around the world could be working on a single Go-0gle Sheets file and seeing the changes they all make in real time.
Answer:
The total loan value would be of $261,825
Explanation:
In order to calculate how expensive of a home can Tedd purchase using a 4%, 30 year mortgage we would have to calculate first the amount of annual payments as follows:
amount of annual payments = $48,000*0.25 = $12,000
PMT = 12,000/12 = 1000
FV = 0
rate = 4%/12
N = 30*12
Hence, use FV function in Excel amount after down payment = $209,461.24
this represents 80% of the loan
, so total loan value = $209,461.24/0.8 = $261,825
The total loan value would be of $261,825
Answer:
Instructions are listed below
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Suppose you just bought an annuity with 9 annual payments of $15,400 at the current interest rate of 11 percent per year.
First, we need to determine the final value with the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
Then, we can calculate the present value with the following formula:
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
A)i=11%
FV= {15400*[(1.11^9)-1]}/0.11
FV= $218,125.17
PV= 218,125.17/(1.11^9)= $85,270.53
B) i= 6%
FV= {15400*[(1.06^9)-1]}/0.06
FV= $176,966.27
PV= 176,966.27/(1.06^9)= $104,746.06
C) i= 16%
FV= $269,785.02
PV= $70,940.77
Answer:
The Journal entries are as follows:
(i) On January 1, 2017
Plant Assets A/c Dr. $600,000
To cash $600,000
[To record the depot]
(ii) On January 1, 2017
Plant Assets A/c Dr. $41,879
To To Asset retirement obligation $41,879
[To record the Asset retirement obligation]
Missing information: Based on an effective-interest rate of 6%, the present value of the asset retirement obligation on January 1, 2017, is $41,879.
Answer:
Answer explained
Explanation:
The case is about the defamation claimed by plaintiff on the defendant on the basis of race remark of g a y or bisexual by third party information. This ultimately broken the relationship of two person.
I think that court should ultimately found that the accusations of homosexuality or bisexuality amounted to defamation per se because of the following reason:
- The Race Remark on the plaintiff by the defendant.
- It is a slander per se.
- This remark impute to the commission of the crime of sodomy.
- It is implying Unchastity that means Exposing Plaintiff to Public Hatred. This spoils the life of the plaintiff.
