No you could have left it as the last but one line or write them separately as
11/18 + √85 / 18 , 11/18 - √85/18
My friend... My method wasn't wrong and I couldn't find any mistake on my procedure... Check it out and analyze it by yourself...
Check the picture below.
so the rhombus has the diagonals of AC and BD, now keeping in mind that the diagonals bisect each, namely they cut each other in two equal halves, let's find the length of each.
![\bf ~~~~~~~~~~~~\textit{distance between 2 points} \\\\ A(\stackrel{x_1}{-4}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{-2})\qquad C(\stackrel{x_2}{6}~,~\stackrel{y_2}{8})\qquad \qquad % distance value d = \sqrt{( x_2- x_1)^2 + ( y_2- y_1)^2} \\\\\\ AC=\sqrt{[6-(-4)]^2+[8-(-2)]^2}\implies AC=\sqrt{(6+4)^2+(8+2)^2} \\\\\\ AC=\sqrt{10^2+10^2}\implies AC=\sqrt{10^2(2)}\implies \boxed{AC=10\sqrt{2}}\\\\ -------------------------------](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20~~~~~~~~~~~~%5Ctextit%7Bdistance%20between%202%20points%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%0AA%28%5Cstackrel%7Bx_1%7D%7B-4%7D~%2C~%5Cstackrel%7By_1%7D%7B-2%7D%29%5Cqquad%20%0AC%28%5Cstackrel%7Bx_2%7D%7B6%7D~%2C~%5Cstackrel%7By_2%7D%7B8%7D%29%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20%0A%25%20%20distance%20value%0Ad%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%28%20x_2-%20x_1%29%5E2%20%2B%20%28%20y_2-%20y_1%29%5E2%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0AAC%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5B6-%28-4%29%5D%5E2%2B%5B8-%28-2%29%5D%5E2%7D%5Cimplies%20AC%3D%5Csqrt%7B%286%2B4%29%5E2%2B%288%2B2%29%5E2%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0AAC%3D%5Csqrt%7B10%5E2%2B10%5E2%7D%5Cimplies%20AC%3D%5Csqrt%7B10%5E2%282%29%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7BAC%3D10%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-------------------------------)
![\bf ~~~~~~~~~~~~\textit{distance between 2 points} \\\\ B(\stackrel{x_1}{-2}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{6})\qquad D(\stackrel{x_2}{4}~,~\stackrel{y_2}{0})\qquad \qquad BD=\sqrt{[4-(-2)]^2+[0-6]^2} \\\\\\ BD=\sqrt{(4+2)^2+(-6)^2}\implies BD=\sqrt{6^2+6^2} \\\\\\ BD=\sqrt{6^2(2)}\implies \boxed{BD=6\sqrt{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20~~~~~~~~~~~~%5Ctextit%7Bdistance%20between%202%20points%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%0AB%28%5Cstackrel%7Bx_1%7D%7B-2%7D~%2C~%5Cstackrel%7By_1%7D%7B6%7D%29%5Cqquad%20%0AD%28%5Cstackrel%7Bx_2%7D%7B4%7D~%2C~%5Cstackrel%7By_2%7D%7B0%7D%29%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20BD%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5B4-%28-2%29%5D%5E2%2B%5B0-6%5D%5E2%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0ABD%3D%5Csqrt%7B%284%2B2%29%5E2%2B%28-6%29%5E2%7D%5Cimplies%20BD%3D%5Csqrt%7B6%5E2%2B6%5E2%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0ABD%3D%5Csqrt%7B6%5E2%282%29%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7BBD%3D6%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D)
that simply means that each triangle has a side that is half of 10√2 and another side that's half of 6√2.
namely, each triangle has a "base" of 3√2, and a "height" of 5√2, keeping in mind that all triangles are congruent, then their area is,
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Use consistent units. The length of the roller is 2.8 m. The diameter is 168 cm = 1.68 m
Circumference of roller = 1.68π m
Contact area of roller = 1.68π × 2.8 = 4.704π m²
Each rotation levels 4.704π m² of the playground.
Area of playground = 750 rotations × (4.704π m²)/rotation
= 3528π m²
≈ 11,084 m²
Answer:
The correct option is SSS (Side-Side-Side) Theorem
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is incomplete because the diagrams of ΔLON and ΔLMN are not given. I have attached the diagram of both triangles below for better understanding of the question.
Consider the diagram attached below. We have to find the congruence theorem which can be used to prove that ΔLON ≅ ΔLMN
We can see in the diagram that both triangle have a common side that is LN. It means 1 side of both triangles is congruent because LN≅LN
Consider the sides ON and MN. Both side have a single bar on them, which means that it is given that both of these side are congruent. Hence ON≅MN
Consider the sides LO and LM. Both side have a double bars on them, which means that it is given that both of these side are also congruent. Hence LO≅LM
SSS theorem states that if all sides of the triangles are congruent, then the triangles themselves are also congruent, which is the same case in this question