The life style one is seen as leading
<em>Yes, it was a very wise thing to do.</em> Whenever we create new content that we want to present to the public, we have to acknowledge any other material that might contain similar information to ours. Sometimes, this might happen on purpose, like when we research a topic and we find information in other sources that will enhance our research. In this case, we cite our sources as references.
In the case of Jerome, the overlap was accidental. However, if he is aware of it, it is still a good strategy to acknowledge it for several reasons.
Listeners will be aware of the overlap, so they will be less likely to accuse him of plagiarism (claiming another person’s idea are our own).
They will also be more patient with redundant information, instead of getting bored.
It will show that Jerome cares about the proper acknowledgement of sources of information, so they are more likely to trust the rest of his speech.
Finally, the audience is aware of the fact that Jerome could not have predicted this overlap, so they will appreciate his resourcefulness for having a strategy to work around it.
The catheter must be
Flushed with sterile water in preparation for additional suctioning.
Rinse the catheters in cool water and air-dry.
<h3>
What is a French tip catheter?</h3>
Coudé is French for “bend” therefore a coudé catheter is a type of catheter that is mostly straight but has a tip that curves/bends slightly.
Some people refer to these types of catheters as a bent tip catheter—they are the same thing and used interchangeably.
There are three main types of catheters: indwelling catheters. external catheters. short-term catheters.
If you have a blockage or enlarged prostate, coudé tip catheters will be more comfortable and relieve any discomfort. The slight curve helps to reduce friction and cause less irritation. If you have strictures, a coudé tip will be your best option.
To learn more about catheter, refer
brainly.com/question/1507811
#SPJ4
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
