Answer:
x + 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Every time it goes up by a factor of 5
Tell me I am wrong.
Can I get brainliest
Answer:
Claim : men weigh of wild jackalopes is 69.9
The null hypothesis : H0 : μ = 69.9
Alternative hypothesis : H1 : μ ≠ 69.9
Test statistic = −2.447085
P value = 0.0174
Conclusion :
Fail to Reject the Null hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question given :
The claim is that : mean weight of wild jackalopes is still the same as 10 years with a mean weight of 69.9 lbs.
The null hypothesis : H0 : μ = 69.9
Alternative hypothesis : H1 : μ ≠ 69.9
Using calculator :
Sample mean (x) = 66
Sample standard deviation (s) = 12.345
The test statistic t :
(x - μ) / (s/√n)
n = sample size = 60
(66 - 69.9) / (12.345 / √60)
t = −2.447085
P value at α 0.01, df = 59 is 0.0174
Since the p value is > 0.01, the result is not significant at 0.01. Therefore, we fail to reject the Null
' 9 + 10 ' is a simple exercise in addition. Its solution is 19 .
There is junk floating around the internet saying that 9+10=21.
That statement is false, and the arithmetic is wrong.
The whole thing is a joke. If you ask someone to prove it, they will
perform a demonstration with Roman numerals, but the way they handle
the Roman numerals is itself defective, and they're hoping you won't notice.
Answer:
E(3.75,-2.5)
G(-0.75,-3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Point E is the midpoint of the segment AB, then it has coordinates
Point F is the midpoint of the segment EB, then it has coordinates
Let S be the midpoint of segment CB, then it has coordinates
Point G is the midpoint of segment CS, then its coordinates are
Answer: x < 7
Step-by-step explanation: Just like any of your two-step equations, in this inequality, start by isolating the x term which in this case is -8x by subtracting 40 from both sides.
That leaves you with -8x > -56.
To get <em>x</em> by itself, divide both sides by -8 but watch out.
If you divide both sides of an inequality by a negative,
you must switch the direction of the inequality sign.
So we have x < 7.
