The easiest way to do this is to divide 225 by 3, so 225 / 3, and what you get as the sum, in this case it's 75, you would multiply the sum by 2, which equals 150, and that, would be Susan's share. So... 225 / 3 = 75. 75 * 2 = 150. $150 is the amount Susan gets. Hope this helps!
Answer:
<u>B. There is sufficient evidence that the mean of the pressure required to open a certain valve has changed. </u>
Step-by-step explanation:
We make this conclusion based on these reasons:
- We are told that the "null hypothesis was rejected" after the <em>"manager feels that the pressure variability has changed.,</em> meaning the <u>null hypothesis was the opposite of what occurred; that is to say, it is the alternate hypothesis that proved true instead.</u>
- <em>"changes in the manufacturing process"</em> form what can be called "sufficient evidence" that the mean of the pressure required to open the valve has changed, thereby going against the null hypothesis.
It is based on the above reasons that the null hypothesis was rejected.
The second answer i think is the best one
Part A:
Consider from x = -5 to x = -4, they are 1 unit apart and the difference of their outputs is given by:
-3 - (-11) = -3 + 11 = 8.
Thus, the value of the output increases by 8 units for each one unit increase in the input.
Part B:
Consider from x = -3 to x = -1, they are 2 units apart and the difference of their outputs is given by:
21 - 5 = 16.
Thus, the value of the output increases by 16 units for each two units increase in the input.
Part C:
Consider from x = 0 to x = 3, they are 3 units apart and the difference of their outputs is given by:
53 - 29 = 24.
Thus, the value of the output increases by 24 units for each three units increase in the input.
Part D:
It can be noticed that the ratio difference in the outputs to the input intervals are equal for all the given input intervals.
i.e 8 / 1 = 16 / 2 = 24 / 3.
This was asked already
c=pid or
c=2pir
use first one
c=3pi
3pi=c=pid
3pi=pid
divide by pi
3=d
diameter=3 units
