It means "contrary to" or "opposing something". It can be used either as a prefix or as a single word. It is similar to the English word "counter".
Answer:
Authoritative parent
Explanation:
(Don't mistake authoritative style with authoritarian style)
Authoritative parent tend to be heavily involved in the development of children. These parents will have high expectation for their children (they will monitor their children's grade along with the children bad habits). This might make some children feel too pressured
But, to balance it out, they also have high responsiveness whenever the children are experiencing problems/distress.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Chris has used a (n) _______ design for his study, would be: Interventional Clinical Trial design.
Explanation:
The reason for why the answer would be a clinical trial, instead of the closest other option, which would be a Cohort Study, is the fact that what is being evaluated here is the effectiveness of a new treatment program against substance abuse issues. The Cohort Study does not test for an actual treatment, but rather, the situational characteristics that surround the groups being observed and the measures that could be taken to prevent certain outcomes. In clinical trials, however, the focus is precisely to test the outcomes brought on by a new medication, or any other form of treatments, and it requires both a test group, and a control group to determine the outcomes. Since Chris wants to see the success of the treatment on this group of substance abusers, and uses as control, a group who displays the same characteristics, but did not become a part of the tested group, this is known as an Interventional Clinical Trial.
<u>Answer:</u>
The statement ' Inappropriate eligibility criteria could affect a study's construct validity' is true.
Option: (a)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- For the construct of the study to be valid, it is primarily necessary that the criteria of eligibility prescribed for the authenticity of the study is followed strictly.
- If any of the factors that make the study eligible are compromised with, there is a great possibility that the very nature of the study would change to not fit the idea of the study.
Bernard Marx changes a lot throughout the novel "Brave New World," and because of this, it is difficult to establish whether Bernard is really an enemy of the World State. However, the most likely answer is that he is.
The greatest threat to the system, according to this society, is an individual that is unorthodox. This means, an individual that is different from all others and who thinks in a way that is uncommon. This is certainly the case with Bernard, as he is able to feel jealousy, lovesickness and frustrated desire in a society that has "eliminated" it. No one else seems to share these feelings. Therefore, the accusations are true, as Bernard does exhibit an unorthodox behaviour.
The reason why the World State considers this kind of thinking to be dangerous is because it has the possibility of extending to others. If Bernard were to convince people to think like him, many of the assumptions of society would collapse, leading to chaos among people and to the end of the World State regime. I believe that, in some occasions, society is more important than an individual. For example, we create laws that restrict individual freedom in order to protect the interests of society. However, the World State takes this belief too far by completely ignoring the importance of a human life.
