1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hammer [34]
3 years ago
5

The market price of a security is $74. Its expected rate of return is 20.2%. The risk-free rate is 3% and the market risk premiu

m is 6.5%. What will be the market price of the security if its correlation coefficient with the market portfolio doubles (and all other variables remain unchanged)
Business
1 answer:
tigry1 [53]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The market price of the security if its correlation coefficient with the market portfolio doubles (and all other variables remain unchanged) will be $44.10.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore presented before answering the question as follows:

The market price of a security is $74. Its expected rate of return is 20.2%. The risk-free rate is 3% and the market risk premium is 6.5%. What will be the market price of the security if its correlation coefficient with the market portfolio doubles (and all other variables remain unchanged)

Assume that the stock is expected to pay a constant dividend in perpetuity.

Explanation of the answer is now given as follows:

Since the correlation coefficient with the market portfolio doubles (and all other variables remain unchanged), it implies that beta and also the risk premium will also double.

From the question, we can obtain:

Current risk premium = Expected rate of return - Market risk premium = 20.2% - 6.5% = 13.70%

As the current risk premium will double, we have:

New risk premium = Current risk premium * 2 = 13.70% * 2 = 27.40%

Also, we have:

New discount rate = New risk premium + Market risk premium = 27.40% + 6.5% = 33.90%

Since it is assumed that the stock is expected to pay a constant dividend in perpetuity, the dividend can therefore e calculated as follows:

Dividend = Current market price * Current expected rate of return = $74 * 20.2% = $14.95

The new market price of the security can now be calculated as follows:

New market price of the security = Dividend / New discount rate = $14.95 / 33.90% = $44.10

Therefore, the market price of the security if its correlation coefficient with the market portfolio doubles (and all other variables remain unchanged) will be $44.10.

You might be interested in
Which of the following actions would be most likely to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and bondholders?
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

C. Including restrictive covenants in the company's bond indenture (which is the contract between the company and its bondholders).  

Explanation:

One of the major actions that would most likely reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and bondholder is the Inclusion of restrictive covenants in the company's bond indenture (which is the contract between the company and its bondholders).  

Restrictive covenants are Bond covenants that are designed to protect the interests of both parties by forbiding the issuer from undertaking certain activities that are detrimental to the holders of the bond.

Restrictive covenants manages the agency problem between stockholders and bondholder.

5 0
3 years ago
If a gig economy driver takes the standard mileage rate (SMR), which additional expense is allowed on top of the SMR?
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:how do i get out of this

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Producers will supply an inefficiently low quality of a good if the government imposes:
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

A binding price ceiling

Explanation:

A binding price ceiling is a situation when the government force the producers to put the price of their product below the equilibrium price.

When being forced into a situation, most of the producers will find some other way to maximize their profit beside raising the price. This will most likely make them reduce the quality of materials that used to produce the goods. This will lower the capital needed for the production and increase the profit. But in return, the supply will be inefficiently and have low quality.

6 0
3 years ago
Considering that Holmes and Balwani are the only ones charged by the SEC and the only ones facing criminal charges, what, if any
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

The investors, board of directors and employees for Theranos are not likely to have been completely free of fault in the more than a decade long fraud. The press has called the firm 'secretive' as it struggled to find any pertinent information about the it due to their closely guarded secrets. The firm operated a website that didn't have much on it and seemed to gag its directors, investors and others from talking to the press. These alone should have been a red flag to the investors and board. The PR person also refused interviews, neglected to answer questions about the owners/founders and turned down multiple overtures by the press to try and find out what was going on behind closed doors at Theranos. This encouraged the general perception that the firm was trying to control and minimise risk and possibly to retain an air of mystery. All of which was actually designed to hide the true workings of the firm, and this should have been questioned by all the people involved in the firm.

(Leuty, 2013)

The board as illustrious as theirs would have asked for supporting documentation and reviews for all the key aspects of the company and these would have needed to be audited periodically to ensure that the board can choose the best people in key roles and to enable good decision-making.

Investors also would have done a background check on all material aspects such as legal, ethical etc. before handing over large sums of money.

Employees involved in the actual fraud - falsifying results, using other tools to get the results that their tools were supposed to generate etc. were also aware of the issues with the firm likely from the very beginning.

All three groups possibly knew some or all of the aspects of the fraud and yet they did not come forward to disclose the same to the authorities or their customers as they should have. This points to a serious moral lapse amongst all three groups. They each as a group and as individuals in that group needed to take moral responsibility for the fraudulent activities being perpetrated by the couple. As the law goes, the prime players only end up being held accountable however it would have been ethically right for all parties that knew of the fraud to come forward and expose it.

Leaving aside the monetary considerations such as fleecing investors and customers alike, the products were related to the medical field, which above all others has a responsibility to maintain a higher standard of ethics. This fraud caused countless incorrect results that would have been used in medical therapies and diagnoses leading to wrong medication allocations and patient treatments. This in turn would have led to pain and anguish of the physical kind for so many patients, all of whom are the silent sufferers in this fraud.

Legally, pain and suffering cannot be quantified (just estimated) while this is the primary damage that the couple should have actually been charged with. This extremity of damage cannot be adequately presented in a court of law however and that brings us to discussing the morality of the situation. For all of the reasons stated above, the couple and everyone involved in enabling them in the fraud - the board of directors, employees and investors, should definitely be held accountable, if not in a court of law, then at least in the court of public opinion so that fraudsters like them do not get away without paying a price for their actions. All actions have consequences and their actions or lack there of should be accounted for.

References :

Leuty, Ron (2013) Secretive Theranos emerging (partly) from shadows. San Francisco Business Times.

6 0
4 years ago
Assume there is a simultaneous decrease in the incomes of people in the market for new homes and a decrease in the wages paid to
ioda

Answer:

Lower price for new houses.

Explanation:

The decrease in the income of people will decrease the demand for houses and the demand curve will shift leftwards. Meanwhile, the decrease in the wages for carpenters, plumbers, etc will decrease the cost of production so the producer will supply more when the cost of production decreases. So supply curve will shift rightwards. Resulting there will be lower prices due to shifts in the leftward demand curve and rightward supply curve.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Applicants for positions at a product distribution site are required to demonstrate the ability to drive a forklift and operate
    14·1 answer
  • A bank will often hold government securities as an asset. If a bank were to sell S500,000 in government securities to an individ
    8·1 answer
  • An analysis of comparative balance sheets, the current year's income statement, and the general ledger accounts of Hailey Corp.
    15·1 answer
  • Dmitri has insurance with Hysterical Coverage Insurance Company, Inc. (Hysterica Coverage). Dmitri has a wreck with Susie. The a
    12·1 answer
  • Ted earned $150,000 during the current year. He paid Alice, his former wife, $75,000 in alimony. The couple divorced in 2016. Un
    7·1 answer
  • A change in the amount of sales can be due to either a change in the units sold or a change in price or both.
    9·1 answer
  • Toussaint Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for merchandise that it will resell. The merchandise had
    14·1 answer
  • Haroldsen Corporation is considering a capital budgeting project that would require an initial investment of $350,000. The inves
    14·2 answers
  • Suppose ABC Dairy is one firm competing in the perfectly competitive market for milk. Now suppose ABC Dairy decides to produce o
    9·1 answer
  • (a)<br>What is the meaning of subsidiary company (2)<br>​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!