It is practical knowledge in the sense that we know why some parts of the world are inherently risky to live in. Even though volcanic eruptionis, earthquakes and tsunamis are difficult to predict, it makes sense to have building codes and emergency plans that take this into account.
It is science’s response to the beliefs that natural catastrophes (volcanism, earthquakes and tsunamis) are divine punishments for the evil ways of some individuals.
Even if you will never use or apply this knowledge, knowing about the theory of plate tectonics gives you a current scientific perspective on what we know about the natural world.
It is a good example of how scientific theories proceed by trying to fit several observations into a coherent explanation.
Learning about the observations that needed to be made and explained for the theory to win over scientists helps caution you against people who adopt belief systems without questioning the myths told to them, or those who try to profit from ignorance of how nature actually works.
When it is well taught, it should convince you that, like any scientific theory, plate tectonics is a “work in progress”. New discoveries continue to be made, and it takes creative and logical thinking, debate and a quest for more observations in order to determine which ones prove or challenge the current theory and which ones may lead to its refinement.
The answer would be "a person's skin"
hope this helps :)
True More people do live in development nations than live in developed nations
An Rh negative individual does not contain anti Rh antibodies. Rh- antibodies only develop in cases of pregnancy, miscarriage or a blood transfusion like if you have Rh-negative blood you got AB blood. The Rh-antibodies then work to attack the foreign substance, the RBCs. In the fetus, loss of RBCs means the rise of bilburin and could eventually lead to brain damage and also have low muscle tone.
The major organ that you would find in the lymphatic system would be the spleen.
