Answer:
Are responsible family members.
Respect and obey the laws of the land.
Respect the rights and property of others.
Are loyal to their country and proud of its ccomplishments.
Take part in and improve life in their communities.
Take an active part in their government.
Use natural resources wisely
He is not afraid of death.
He is always hopeful and never loose hope.
He protect his country from its enemies.
Answer:
<u>It means that the test would have high reliability and not so for the validity.</u>
Explanation:
Even though the test may have reliabiltiy because it can be consistent in some of the structure of evaluation. This doesn't mean that it would be a valid test, because it is biased.
The psychometrc propertes are measured both by validity and reliabiltiy. This means the score can be reliable but as it is biased, it is not reflecting the knowlede and skills so it loses it's validity.
Answer:
- Harmony.
- Respect.
- Care.
Explanation:
Some values that are important to the people who live and work in the new nation could be harmony, respect, and care.
Nowadays many people that have different customs, traditions, etc; go to live to other countries where things are different so I think that harmony is important in a society because people with different traits and culture live can work and play in a common space where people tolerate each other.
So it is also important to accept there are different beliefs, traditions because there are people from different nationalities and races that need to work and live in the same country and in the same space in close proximity. So it is important to respect and to uphold the law to maintain pease an order.
Besides, care is important in a society in which people look out for each other with a helping hand, when there are some problems in the community or when a neighbour has a problem. A caring society is what we need to live in peace
Are strategic waterways that have been the center of conflicts..
Research on <u>"the fundamental attribution error" </u>suggests it is <u>"common"</u> for people to assume that dispositions are the underlying causes of most behaviors.
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inward factors, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside variables, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct. We may, for instance, clarify the way that somebody is jobless in view of his character, and point the finger at him for his predicament, when in certainty he was as of late laid off because of a lazy economy. Obviously, there are times when we're right about our suspicions, however the key attribution blunder is our inclination to clarify the conduct of others in light of character or air. This is especially obvious when the conduct is negative.
