It is an absolute true statement that science fiction depicts how science, both real and imaginary, affects individuals and society. The correct option among all the options that are given in this question is the first option. Science fiction actually affects the imagination of the people and the children in a great way.
Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
The answer is false. It is because in assessing the health risk of an individual, it is best to assess the factors that could contribute of risking the health of the individual. Emotional reaction could be one of the factors that is needed to be asses in the health risk of an individual, that is why it does not need to be ignored but it needs to be focused on.
In this given scenario, the relevant amendments discussed here are the <u>fifth and sixth </u>amendments.
<h3>What are fifth and sixth amendments?</h3>
The Fifth Amendment's privilege in opposition to self-incrimination protects witnesses from pressured self-incrimination.
The Sixth Amendment affords criminal defendants with the proper to cross-observe prosecution witnesses and to have an obligatory method for acquiring witnesses.
Thus, In this given scenario, the relevant amendments discussed here are the <u>fifth and sixth </u>amendments.
Learn more about fifth and sixth amendments here:
brainly.com/question/14967470
#SPJ4
