Answer:
The Greeks joined clinical and clinical life structures hypothesis from the Egyptians, which, in this sense, assumed a vital part in preparing for the improvement of the anatomical sciences (Loukas et al., 2011; Standring, 2006). Galen (129–199 AD) and Aristotle are typically viewed as the dads of life structures (Russel, 1916; Singer, 2005; Leroi, 2014). However, Galen's human life systems were frequently off-base, since he never dismembered people, in any event not to the public information. The way of life of human analyzation grew essentially in the Christian West, rather than the Greco‐Roman culture of the dead body, in which the human body was viewed as debased (Park, 2006). Indeed, Galen based his depictions of human life structures on analyzations of creatures, for example, sheep, bulls, pigs, canines, bears, and especially the "Barbary gorilla," an Old World monkey (Macaca Sylvanus) that has a minimal tail and subsequently cursorily appears to be a primate in this regard (Singer, 2005, 2016; Cole, 1975). Since the life systems of this monkey are altogether different from that of people, especially concerning delicate tissues, for example, muscles (Diogo and Wood, 2012), verifiable blunders had large amounts of Galen's depictions of human life structures. For example, he didn't depict the two most curious muscles of the human forelimb, the flexor pollicis longus, and extensor pollicis brevis, as unmistakable muscles (more models given in Supporting Information Table 1). Also, aside from such exact depictions of macaques that are mistaken for people, he incorrectly portrayed highlights that are comparative in people and macaques, adding to additional blunders about human life structures. For instance, he didn't perceive the extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus as discrete muscles (Supporting Information Table 1).
Explanation:
Brainliest :)
Answer:
D. post-traumatic stress disorder
Explanation:
PTSD is <em>a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event</em>.
Some symptoms of this disorder are having nightmares about the event, and avoiding situations that could trigger memories of the event. Sandra has those symptoms! More symptoms of PTSD she has is heightened reactions (she flinches when going through intersections) and anxiety (she's anxious when driving).
Answer:
Jem chose not to return the blanket so as to save Boo Radley from getting into trouble with his father. He told Atticus "<em>I swear to God he ain’t ever harmed us, he ain’t ever hurt us, he coulda cut my throat from ear to ear that night but he tried to mend my pants instead… he ain’t ever hurt us, Atticus"</em>
Explanation:
In Harper Lee's novel "To Kill A Mockingbird", the residents of Maycomb seem to all have a common understanding not to get too involved with the Radleys. They, including Atticus Finch, also tell their children to not disturb them. That was how the Radleys came to be regarded as something to be abhorred.
But Chapter 8 shows the realization of not only Jem but Atticus himself that Boo Radley was far from who they had been thinking he'd be. One such evidence in this chapter is the fire scene where all of Maycomb had come out to help put out the fire from Miss Maudie's place. Atticus had asked them to stay put at the Radley's gate where they stayed till everything was over. So engrossed were they with the scene that they did not even realize Boo, who was a recluse, had actually ventured out of the house to put a blanket over Scout who must have been feeling cold. This shows how sensitive Boo is, not forgetting he was the one who had left those numerous 'gifts' at the tree hole and had also mended Jem's torn pants before. In his decision to not return the blanket to him, Jem's action signifies he doesn't want Boo to be scolded or even have any hard time with his father for his kindness to Scout. This incident made Jem realize Boo Radley is not a source of danger, which Scout still didn't.
Answer:
authoritarianism
Explanation:
authoritarianism is said to be blind and total commitment to a goal, belief about good or bad, right or wrong.
the authoritarian personality is one which requires blindly and total committed to a leader, total obedience to the others rules and regulations and absolute respect for constituted authorities
those with authoritarian personality believes in the use of force or harsh means to ensure that people succumb to what he or she require of them. most times, the people with this kind of personalities hardly trust or believe in others. they see negativity in others.
