Dr. López has probably found
"mirror neurons".
A mirror neuron is a neuron that flames both when a creature acts and when the creature watches a similar activity performed by another. Hence, the neuron "mirrors" the conduct of alternate, as if the onlooker were itself acting. Such neurons have been straight forwardly seen in primate species.
Answer:
The Constitution of Bhutan (Dzongkha: འབྲུག་གི་རྩ་ཁྲིམས་ཆེན་མོ་; Wylie: 'Druk-gi cha-thrims-chen-mo) was enacted 18 July 2008 by the Royal Government of Bhutan. The Constitution was thoroughly planned by several government officers and agencies over a period of almost seven years amid increasing democratic reforms in Bhutan. The current Constitution is based on Buddhist philosophy, international Conventions on Human Rights, comparative analysis of 20 other modern constitutions, public opinion, and existing laws, authorities, and precedents.[1] According to Princess Sonam Wangchuck, the constitutional committee was particularly influenced by the Constitution of South Africa because of its strong protection of human rights.[2]
Answer:
Correct Answer: The two consequences include:
1. Europe received tobacco, furs, and corn from the New World.
3. Europe sent horses, firearms, and olives to the New World.
Explanation:
Columbian Exchange happens to be the largest part of a more general process of biological globalization that followed the transoceanic voyaging of the 15th and 16th centuries. <em>The consequences profoundly shaped world history in trade most obviously in the Americas, Europe, and Africa. The exchange is divided into three major types like diseases exported, animals trade as well as plant based exchanges</em>
Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the forbade workplace discrimination based on race. The arrangements of this social liberties act denied separation on the premise of sex and additionally race in contracting, advancing, and terminating. "Sex" was included at last.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
