Answer:
The smallest of the said odd numbers is 27
Step-by-step explanation:
Since it is 3 odd numbers that sums up to 87, the first thing to do is to divide 87 by 3
That is 87/3 = 29, which is an odd number
The nearest odd numbers to 29 are 27 and 31, and the total of all these three odd numbers is 87
That is 27+29+31 = 87, which are consecutive odd numbers.
The smallest odd number here is therefore 27
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A suitable table or calculator is needed.
One standard deviation from the mean includes 68.27% of the total, so the number of bottles in the range 20 ± 0.16 ounces will be ...
0.6827·26,000 = 17,750 . . . . . within 20 ± 0.16
__
The number below 1.5 standard deviations below the mean is about 6.68%, so for the given sample size is expected to be ...
0.66799·26,000 = 1737 . . . . . below 19.76
_____
<em>Comment on the first number</em>
The "empirical rule" tells you that 68% of the population is within 1 standard deviation (0.16 ounces) of the mean. When the number involved is expected to be expressed to 5 significant digits, your probability value needs better accuracy than that. To 6 digits, the value is 0.682689, which gives the same "rounded to the nearest integer" value as the one shown above.
Answer:
The correct answer is d) the ratio of the change in y to the change in x along the line.
We can tell this by looking at the slope formula.
m (slope) = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
(x+1)(x−4)(3x−4). Mark brainliest :))
Answer:
its b
Step-by-step explanation: