1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
beks73 [17]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following would an economist be most concerned with ?

History
1 answer:
natulia [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the right answer is a

Explanation:

I hope it is helpful for you

You might be interested in
I need help pleaseee
dangina [55]
It’s not letting me pull up the photo
7 0
3 years ago
Write a short CER response using our previous learnings to answer the question: Why is it important to learn
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

Harriet Tubman was born in 1821 into a family of enslaved African Americans on a plantation in Dorchester County, Maryland, owned by Edward Brodas. Her birth name was Araminta and was known by minty, till she changed her name as an early teen to Harriet, after her mother. many of her 11 siblings were sold and taken to the deep south.

At age 5, Tubman was "rented" to neighbors to do housework. She was not great at household chores and was often beaten and abused by her slaveholders and "renters'' due to her skill. Like other African Americans, As a child she was never taught to read or write and never had a broad span of education in general. Eventually she was put to work as a field hand, which she preferred over the housework. At age 15, she suffered a head injury when she blocked the path of the overseer pursuing an uncooperative enslaved person. The overseer flung a weight at the other enslaved people, hitting Tubman, who probably sustained a severe concussion. She was ill for a long time and never fully recovered.

In 1844 or 1845, Tubman married John Tubman, a free Black man. Shortly after her marriage, she hired a lawyer to investigate her legal history and discovered that her mother had been freed on a technicality upon the death of a former enslaver The lawyer advised her that a court wouldn't likely hear the case, so she dropped it. But knowing that she should have been born free led her to contemplate freedom and resent her situation.

In 1849, Tubman heard that two of her brothers were about to be sold to the Deep South, and her husband threatened to sell her, too. She tried to persuade her brothers to escape with her but left alone, making her way to Philadelphia and freedom. The next year, Tubman decided to return to Maryland to free her sister and her sister's family. Over the next 12 years, she returned 18 or 19 times, bringing more than 300 people out of enslavement.

Explanation:

Writing Workshop: Evaluating Research Questions and Sources in History

4 0
3 years ago
Under the Articles of Confederation, there was only one branch called the Legislative branch.
o-na [289]
False, there were congress not legislative
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
a woman has been indicted for vandalism for putting graffiti on a wall. this is the second time she been accused of this crime.
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Analyzing the scenario, we see that the situation is repeated by the second. It may be that the first time, the woman did not know. But she had already been accused before, that is, that the second time, this was considered intentional and malicious conduct.


According to the penal code § 594, this act is considered vandalism, that is the defacing of another’s property with graffiti “or other inscribed material,” or damaging or destroying another’s property and this cant be done negligently, with the will to do the damage.

If she convicted of felony vandalism again, the maximum prison sentence is three years (after being convicted before) and fines can be up to $10,000.  When the damage caused by the vandalism exceeds $10,000, the fines can be increased to $50,000. Then, comes the restitution (paying the owner property for the damage), and possibly community service.



6 0
3 years ago
Although horrific, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was not reason enough for the United States to enter into World War II.
Anarel [89]
Hey!

 Your answer is false.

Although the war began with Adolf Hitler, the U.S ultimately did not decide to go to war until the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor.

Hope this helps! :)


8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statements accurately describe the Catholic Church's response to the Reformation?
    5·2 answers
  • Asia is ________ of Australia
    12·1 answer
  • What is a significant difference between the Jamestown and Plymouth colonies?
    15·2 answers
  • Match each food item with a culture Japan Kenya Italy
    14·1 answer
  • How did gunpowder technology affect politics in the ottoman empire?
    8·2 answers
  • What does the destruction of the mosques indicate about the importance of Islam in Persia between 1200 and 1450 CE? q5
    9·2 answers
  • Help<br> The Gupta dynasty is best known for its
    8·2 answers
  • What was an important effect of Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England?
    6·2 answers
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST -30 points-
    15·2 answers
  • Alexander Hamilton accused Aaron Burr of
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!