Identify the events that took place during the 1920s that demonstrate the limitations to civil liberties at that time.
The United States Postal Service removed books from the mail that were deemed inappropriate.
- The arrests of a union leader in New Jersey and 400 IWW members in California.
- Hundreds of blacks throughout the South were lynched.
<h3>What is
civil liberties?</h3>
Governments pledge not to restrict civil liberties through the constitution, law, or judicial interpretation without following due process. Civil liberties may include the freedom of conscience, of the press, of religion, of expression, of assembly, of security and liberty, of speech, of privacy, of equal treatment under the law and of due process, of a fair trial, and of life, though the definition of the term varies from country to country. The right to possess property, the right to self-defense, and the right to bodily integrity are examples of other civic rights. There are distinctions between positive liberty/positive rights and negative liberty within the divisions between civil liberties and other sorts of liberties.
To learn more about civil liberties from the given link:
brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ4
Answer: A
Explanation: Corn it was the most popular and benifical
Answer:
Mark as brainliest
Explanation:
symbolic presence in international legal accounts of the 19th century, but for historians of the era its importance has often been doubted. This article seeks to re-interpret the place of the Berlin General Act in late 19th-century history, suggesting that the divergence of views has arisen largely as a consequence of an inattentiveness to the place of systemic logics in legal regimes of this kind.
Issue Section:
Articles
INTRODUCTION
The Berlin West Africa Conference of 1884-1885 has assumed a canonical place in historical accounts of late 19th-century imperialism 1 and this is no less true of the accounts provided by legal scholars seeking to trace the colonial origins of contemporary international law. 2 The overt purpose of the Conference was to ‘manage’ the ongoing process of colonisation in Africa (the ‘Scramble’ as it was dubbed by a Times columnist) so as to avoid the outbreak of armed conflict between rival colonial powers. Its outcome was the conclusion of a General Act 3 ratified by all major colonial powers including the US. 4 Among other things, the General Act set out the conditions under which territory might be acquired on the coast of Africa; it internationalised two rivers (the Congo and the Niger); it orchestrated a new campaign to abolish the overland trade in slaves; and it declared as ‘neutral’ a vast swathe of Central Africa delimited as the ‘conventional basin of the Congo’. A side event was the recognition given to King Leopold’s fledgling Congo Free State that had somewhat mysteriously emerged out of the scientific and philanthropic activities of the Association internationale du Congo . 5
If for lawyers and historians the facts of the Conference are taken as a common starting point, this has not prevented widely divergent interpretations of its significance from emerging. On one side, one may find an array of international lawyers, from John Westlake 6 in the 19th century to Tony Anghie 7 in the 21 st century, affirming the importance of the Conference and its General Act for having created a legal and political framework for the subsequent partition of Africa. 8 For Anghie, Berlin ‘transformed Africa into a conceptual terra nullius ’, silencing native resistance through the subordination of their claims to sovereignty, and providing, in the process, an effective ideology of colonial rule. It was a conference, he argues, ‘which determined in important ways the future of the continent and which continues to have a profound influence on the politics of contemporary Africa’. 9
Defeat the Persian empire
Answer: a owns part of that company.
Explanation:
