Answer:
well without rounding <em>anything</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>got</em><em> </em><em>511.9999999992</em><em> </em><em>people</em><em> </em>
Step-by-step explanation:
so the ratio I used was 36 people for every 225 people( 225 because in total he asked 225 people) then I divided 3,200 into 225 to see how many times It would fit, the answer was 14.2222222222 then I multiplied that by 36 and my answer was 511.9999999992 people. I hope this helps, I tried to be as accurate as possible.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a dairy scientist is testing a new feed additive. She chooses 13 cows at random from a large population of cows. She randomly assigns nold = 8 to get the old diet, and nnew = 5 to get the new diet including the additive.
From the data given we get the following
N Mean StDev SE Mean
Sample 1 8 43 5.1824 1.832
Sample 2 5 73 21.0832 9.429
df = 11
Std dev for difference = 13.3689
a) Yes the two are independent. The two sets of cows randomly chosen are definitely independent. Paired means equal number should be there and homogeneous conditions should be maintained.
b) Enclosed
c) Comparison of two means is the test recommended here. Because independent samples are used.\
d) Test statistic= -3.1233
(because of unequal variances we use that method)
95% confidence interval = ( -56.6676 , -3.3324 )
p value <0.05 our alpha
So reject null hypothesis.
The two means are statistically significantly different.