Answer:
a) Δφ = 1.51 rad
, b) x = 21.17 m
Explanation:
This is an interference problem, as they indicate that the distance AP is on the x-axis the antennas must be on the y-axis, the phase difference is
Δr /λ = Δfi / 2π
Δfi = Δr /λ 2π
Δr = r₂-r₁
let's look the distances
r₁ = 57.0 m
We use Pythagoras' theorem for the other distance
r₂ = √ (x² + y²)
r₂ = √(57² + 9.3²)
r₂ = 57.75 m
The difference is
Δr = 57.75 - 57.0
Δr = 0.75 m
Let's look for the wavelength
c = λ f
λ = c / f
λ = 3 10⁸ / 96.0 10⁶
λ = 3.12 m
Let's calculate
Δφ = 0.75 / 3.12 2π
Δφ = 1.51 rad
b) for destructive interference the path difference must be λ/2, the equation for destructive interference with φ = π remains
Δr = (2n + 1) λ / 2
For the first interference n = 0
Δr = λ / 2
Δr = r₂ - r₁
We substitute the values
√ (x² + y²) - x = 3.12 / 2
Let's solve for distance x
√ (x² + y²) = 1.56 + x
x² + y² = (1.56 + x)²
x² + y² = 1.56² + 2 1.56 x + x²
y2 = 20.4336 +3.12 x
x = (y² -20.4336) /3.12
x = (9.3² -20.4336) /3.12
x = 21.17 m
This is the distance for the first minimum
I think it would be A: gold ring
if you were to place all of these on a bed of water, the ring would be the first to sink.
Answer:
0.8%
Explanation:
We are given;
Number of oscillations; n = 20
Time taken; t = 25 s
Formula for period of oscillation;
T = t/n = 25/20 = 1.25 s
We are told that the least count is 0.2 s. Thus, error is; ΔT = 0.2 s
percentage error in the measurement of time is given by;
(0.2/(20 × 1.25)) × 100% = 0.8%
Answer:
The shortest distance is
Explanation:
The free body diagram of this question is shown on the first uploaded image
From the question we are told that
The speed of the bicycle is 
The distance between the axial is 
The mass center of the cyclist and the bicycle is
behind the front axle
The mass center of the cyclist and the bicycle is
above the ground
For the bicycle not to be thrown over the
Momentum about the back wheel must be zero so

=> 
=> 
Here 
So 
Apply the equation of motion to this motion we have

Where 
and
since the bicycle is coming to a stop

=>
Idk can u say it in a another way