your answer is: Fido's decision is sensible because the cost of the car loan should be less if his credit history improves.
Based on accounting principles, a $1 per unit tax levied on consumers of a good is equivalent to "a $1 per unit tax levied on producers of the good."
This is based on the idea that the market reaches the exact equilibrium price irrespective of who is accountable for paying the money to the government.
In other words, when the government levies a tax on a good, producers are not exempted from the tax levy because that money will be recouped from the producers' sales or revenue.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that tax on goods is inevitable to consumers and producers.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/22680521
Answer:
The correct answer is (a)- Integrated cost leadership/differentiation.
Explanation:
Companies that integrate strategies instead of relying solely on a generic strategy are able to adapt quickly and learn new technologies. Products manufactured under the leadership of integrated costs-differentiation strategy are less distinctive than differentiators and the costs are not as low as the cost-leader, but combine the advantages of both approaches. A somewhat distinctive product that is mid-range in price can be a big attraction for customers than a cheap generic product or an especially expensive one.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Pricing plays an essential role for a product and organisation. At a very basic level, an organisation exists to make profit. A price must cover the cost of a good sold.
Pricing also plays a role in the perception of a product (marketing mix). For example, an Apple product is not cheap because of some perceived value of the product.
Another reason why pricing is integral is in times of competition, it may be worthwhile to use price to take market share from competitors.
Answer: The answer is as follows:
Explanation:
From these numbers, we can conclude that USA has a comparative in producing cars and France has a comparative advantage in producing bottles.
Opportunity cost shows that how many units of one good have to be foregone in order to produce one additional unit of other good.
In USA:
Opportunity cost of producing bottles = 
= 0.75
Opportunity cost of producing cars = 
= 1.33
In France:
Opportunity cost of producing bottles = 
= 0.55
Opportunity cost of producing cars = 
= 1.8
Above calculations clearly shows that USA has a lower opportunity in producing 1 unit of car as compared to the France, so it has a comparative advantage in producing cars.
Whereas, France has a lower opportunity in producing 1 unit of bottle as compared to the USA, so it has a comparative advantage in producing Bottles.
