Answer and Explanation:
The computation of composite score for each location is shown below:-
Composite score for A is
= 0.15 × 89 + .20 × 75 + 0.18 × 92 + 0.27 × 92 + 0.10 × 93 + 0.10 × 90
= 88.05
Composite score for B is
= 0.15 × 78 + .20 × 93 + 0.18 × 90 + 0.27 × 93 + 0.10 × 97 + 0.10 × 96
= 90.91
Composite score for C is
= 0.15 × 84 + .20 × 98 + 0.18 × 87 + 0.27 × 82 + 0.10 × 84 + 0.10 × 95
= 87.90
Therefore for computing the composite score for each location we simply multiply weight with A location and in the same manner of A, B and C
b. The maximum composite score from A, B and C is B
Answer:
Pros and cons are for every method listed below. A person can only see his strength and power during self assessment and he may ignore all his mistakes as it can be his over confidence in himself. Graphic rating may be disappointing as many employees can get same rating and there will not be any difference among them in the pay rise.
Explanation:
There are four major performance appraisal tools
1. Self assessment
2. Graphic Rating
3. Behavioral Checklist
4. 360 degree feedback
Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
Amortization is a technique used in accounting. It involves the process of spreading payment over multiple periods. In accounting, amortization refers to the allocation of the cost of intangible assets over its lifetime.
For instance, amortization of a loan means spreading the interest and principal of the loan over its lifetime. It means fixed monthly payments of interest and principal.
Answer:
The restaurant need to sell 46.6 slices (47 slices)
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The restaurant sells pizza at a rate of $13.57/slice. Expenses for the restaurant include raw material for pizza at $8.57 per slice, $172.00 as monthly rental and $61.00 monthly as insurance.
To calculate the break-even point in units, we need to use the following formula:
Break-even point= fixed costs/ contribution margin
Break-even point= (172 + 61) / (13.57 - 8.57)
Break-even point= 46.6 slices
Answer:
Consider the following calculations
Explanation:
a) If the weight of risky portfolio is 'y' then weight of T-bill would be (1-y).
Expected return on clients portfolio = weight of risky portfolio x return on risky portfolio + weight of T-bill x return on T-bill
or, 15% = y x 17% + (1 - y) x 7%
or, y = 0.8
weight of risky portfolio = 0.8, weight of T-bill = 0.2
b)
Security Investment Proportions
T-bill 20% (from part a)
Stock A 80% x 0.27 = 21.6%
Stock B 80% x 0.33 = 26.4%
Stock C 80% x 0.40 = 32%
Total 100%
