
Btw it's an inequality not an equation
Answer:
The null hypothesis is that all the different teaching methods have the same average test scores.
H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = μ4 = μ5
The alternative hypothesis is that at least one of the teaching methods have a different mean.
Ha: at least one mean is different. (μ1 ≠ μi)
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis (H0) tries to show that no significant variation exists between variables or that a single variable is no different than its mean. While an alternative Hypothesis (Ha) attempt to prove that a new theory is true rather than the old one. That a variable is significantly different from the mean.
For the case above, let μ represent the average test scores for the teaching methods:
The null hypothesis is that all the different teaching methods have the same average test scores.
H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = μ4 = μ5
The alternative hypothesis is that at least one of the teaching methods have a different mean.
Ha: at least one mean is different. (μ1 ≠ μi)
1. Subtract 8 from both sides
2. Simplify to get x= -23
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
When solving for x as an exponent, we need to use logarithms in order to undo the operation and rearrange the terms. We use log rules to bring down the exponent and solve. Logarithms are the inverse operations to exponents and vice versa. We have one special kind of logarithm called the natural logarithm whose base is e. We write it as ln. Since our base is e here, we will use the natural logarithm to rearrange and isolate x.

We begin by applying the natural logarithm to each side.

Log rules allow use to rearrange the exponent as multiplication in front of the log.

ln e as an inverse simplifies to 1.

We now apply the inverse operations for subtraction and multiplication.

Option A is correct.