Answer:
No, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’.
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The rule of the reflection across the line y=x is equal to
(x,y) -------> (y,x)
so
A(-6,6) -------> A'(6,-6) ----> is ok
B(-3,3) ------> B'(3,-3) ----> is ok
C(-8,2) ------> C'(8,-2) ----> is not ok ( is not a reflection acros the line y=x)
therefore
The triangles are no t congruent, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’
The answer is 0.00125139043
Answer:
There is no way to tell
Step-by-step explanation:
You could be way taller than your parents, the same height, or shorter. There are too many variables at play here.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The standard form of a quadratic is:
To complete the square, the a (leading coefficient) must be 1 and there can only be terms with variables on one side.
The expression given:
follows these rules. Next, we divide the b (linear coefficient) by 2, then square it. Basically:
The b in the expression is -18.
This is the number that is added.
I think the answer would be like 1.5.
