Answer:
Pure competition
Explanation:
Pure competition is a market structure characterized by many competitors selling similar products. Due to the high competition, market forces dertermine prices. Pure competition is also referred to as perfect competition. The other features of pure competition include.
- There many buyers and many sellers who have access to market information
- There are barriers no entry and exit in the market
- Firms sell homogeneous products
- Firms cannot influence the market price. Firms are price takers.
- The units of production such are homogeneous and are freely moving.
Answer: (E) none of the other choices
Explanation:
None of the options are correct in the above question.
The USA extends Most Favoured Nation Status to most countries in the world including Germany so that would not be a reason for the car's not to pass through customs.
The cars could indeed be a threat to national security. Just because they come from a safe country does not mean that they were not tampered with. They need to be properly inspected.
They are indeed a source of competition for US automakers but that would be no reason to stop them. Perhaps tariffs could be applied on them but they will not be stopped.
There is no provision in US Customs practices that prohibits the importation of used cars solely because they are used cars therefore it will not be a reason to halt the car's going through customs.
None of the options are therefore correct.
Answer:
Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58
Explanation:
A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.
If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33
This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.
Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58
Answer:
The advertising spend would reduce income taxes by $2.8 million
Explanation:
The advertising expense since it is allowable expense from profits made in the year would reduce income taxes next year by $2.8 million ($8 million *35%)
This means that because of its tax deductibility,it would make a business sense to incur the advertising cost of $8 million coupled with the fact the it has the potential to increase sales revenue over and above the current level of $280 million
