Answer:
People like to call in and request to be anonymous because they know they are being nosy, or dramatic about a situation. Not always the reason though. But anonymous calls tend to have wrong information in them and can sometimes be completely false, and a way for one person to just try and get someone else in trouble. The problem with that is, you can't do a follow up depending on your department policy. Unless there is some sort of evidence, the person can't be charged, and by not having an available witness, it basically just makes the call a checkup to make sure no one is doing anything wrong.
No, unless a truly barbaric crime has occured, there should be no follow up. The caller wanted to be anonymous, so let them be anonymous unless they decide to come forward with more information.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is
Explanation:
you are most likly to be sober than drunk.
Answer:
A productive and harmonious relationship between the board and management is critical for good governance and organisational effectiveness. The board expects management to accept that the board's role is to monitor and question, probe issues, seek clarification, offer insight and share its knowledge and experience whilst the ministry represents the decisions and are the face of the government.
Explanation:
“If HHS denies your appeal, or does not respond within 20 working days, you may file a lawsuit. You may file a FOIA lawsuit in the U.S. District Court where you live, where you have your principal place of business, where the documents are kept, or in the District of Columbia. In court, HHS will have to prove that any withheld information is covered by one of the exemptions or exclusions listed in the FOIA or is prohibited from release by some other law. If you win a substantial portion of your case, the court may require the government to pay your court costs and reasonable attorney fees.”
